Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28792505›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Fluorescence imaging of bombesin and transferrin receptor expression is comparable to 18F-FDG PET in early detection of sorafenib-induced changes in tumor metabolism.

Jen-Chieh Tseng, Nara Narayanan, Guojie Ho, Kevin Groves, Jeannine Delaney, Bagna Bao, Jun Zhang, Jeffrey Morin, Sylvie Kossodo, Milind Rajopadhye and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Imaging Cancer Metabolism.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jen-Chieh TsengDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-3955
Nara NarayananDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Guojie HoDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kevin GrovesDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jeannine DelaneyDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Bagna BaoDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jun ZhangDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jeffrey MorinDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sylvie KossodoDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Milind RajopadhyeDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jeffrey D PetersonDiscovery & Analytical Solutions R&D, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PerkinElmer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical measurement of tumor volume reduction is the most commonly used approach to assess tumor progression and treatment efficacy in mouse tumor models. However, it is relatively insensitive, and often requires long treatment courses to achieve gross physical tumor destruction. As alternatives, several non-invasive imaging methods such as bioluminescence imaging (BLI), fluorescence imaging (FLI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been developed for more accurate measurement. As tumors have elevated glucose metabolism, 18F-fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) has become a sensitive PET imaging tracer for cancer detection, diagnosis, and efficacy assessment by measuring alterations in glucose metabolism. In particular, the ability of 18F-FDG imaging to detect drug-induced effects on tumor metabolism at a very early phase has dramatically improved the speed of decision-making regarding treatment efficacy. Here we demonstrated an approach with FLI that offers not only comparable performance to PET imaging, but also provides additional benefits, including ease of use, imaging throughput, probe stability, and the potential for multiplex imaging. In this report, we used sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor clinically approved for cancer therapy, for treatment of a mouse tumor xenograft model. The drug is known to block several key signaling pathways involved in tumor metabolism. We first identified an appropriate sorafenib dose, 40 mg/kg (daily on days 0-4 and 7-10), that retained ultimate therapeutic efficacy yet provided a 2-3 day window post-treatment for imaging early, subtle metabolic changes prior to gross tumor regression. We then used 18F-FDG PET as the gold standard for assessing the effects of sorafenib treatment on tumor metabolism and compared this to results obtained by measurement of tumor size, tumor BLI, and tumor FLI changes. PET imaging showed ~55-60% inhibition of tumor uptake of 18F-FDG as early as days 2 and 3 post-treatment, without noticeable changes in tumor size. For comparison, two FLI probes, BombesinRSense™ 680 (BRS-680) and Transferrin-Vivo™ 750 (TfV-750), were assessed for their potential in metabolic imaging. Metabolically active cancer cells are known to have elevated bombesin and transferrin receptor levels on the surface. In excellent agreement with PET imaging, the BRS-680 imaging showed 40% and 79% inhibition on days 2 and 3, respectively, and the TfV-750 imaging showed 65% inhibition on day 3. In both cases, no significant reduction in tumor volume or BLI signal was observed during the first 3 days of treatment. These results suggest that metabolic FLI has potential preclinical application as an additional method for detecting drug-induced metabolic changes in tumors.

Indexed as

Optical ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorColonic NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugFluorescent DyesFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMice, TransgenicMolecular ImagingNeoplasm TransplantationNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsFluorescent DyesFluorodeoxyglucose F18NiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, BombesinReceptors, TransferrinSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID28792505
PMCPMC5549732
OpenAlexW2743649039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.