ArticleYonsei medical journal2017
Proposal Guidelines for Standardized Operating Procedures of Brain Autopsy: Brain Bank in South Korea.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological Correlations of Neurodegenerative Diseases in the National Brain Biobank of Korea.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- One Autopsy Proved Neocortical Lewy Body Disease Without the Involvement of the Olfactory Bulb and Brainstem.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- A Case of Pathologically Confirmed Corticobasal Degeneration Initially Presenting as Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Syndrome.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- An Autopsy-Proven Case of Limbic-Predominant Age-Related TDP-43 Encephalopathy.Yonsei medical journal · 2020Article
- THK5351 and flortaucipir PET with pathological correlation in a Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease patient: a case report.BMC neurology · 2019Article
- Standardized Operational Protocol for Human Brain Banking in China.Neuroscience bulletin · 2019Article
- The Brain Donation Program in South Korea.Yonsei medical journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To obtain an in-depth understanding of brain diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, psychiatric illnesses, and neoplasms, scientific approach and verification using postmortem human brain tissue with or without disease are essential. Compared to other countries that have run brain banks for decades, South Korea has limited experience with brain banking; nationwide brain banks started only recently. The goal of this study is to provide provisional guidelines for brain autopsy for hospitals and institutes that have not accumulated sufficient expertise. We hope that these provisional guidelines will serve as a useful reference for pathologists and clinicians who are involved and interested in the brain bank system. Also, we anticipate updating the provisional guidelines in the future based on collected data and further experience with the practice of brain autopsy in South Korea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.