Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791721›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2017

Cortical control of object-specific grasp relies on adjustments of both activity and effective connectivity: a common marmoset study.

Banty Tia, Mitsuaki Takemi, Akito Kosugi, Elisa Castagnola, Alberto Ansaldo, Takafumi Nakamura, Davide Ricci, Junichi Ushiba, Luciano Fadiga, Atsushi Iriki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Banty TiaLaboratory for Symbolic Cognitive Development, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-399X
Mitsuaki TakemiLaboratory for Symbolic Cognitive Development, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan.
Akito KosugiLaboratory for Symbolic Cognitive Development, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan.
Elisa CastagnolaCenter for Translational Neurophysiology of Speech and Communication, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Ferrara, Italy.
Alberto AnsaldoGraphene Labs, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Takafumi NakamuraLaboratory for Symbolic Cognitive Development, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan.
Davide RicciCenter for Translational Neurophysiology of Speech and Communication, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Ferrara, Italy.
Junichi UshibaDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Luciano FadigaCenter for Translational Neurophysiology of Speech and Communication, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Ferrara, Italy.
Atsushi IrikiLaboratory for Symbolic Cognitive Development, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan.
Italian Institute of Technology · ITKeio University · JPRIKEN Center for Brain Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsThe cortical mechanisms of grasping have been extensively studied in macaques and humans; here, we investigated whether common marmosets could rely on similar mechanisms despite strong differences in hand morphology and grip diversity. We recorded electrocorticographic activity over the sensorimotor cortex of two common marmosets during the execution of different grip types, which allowed us to study cortical activity (power spectrum) and physiologically inferred connectivity (phase-slope index). Analyses were performed in beta (16-35 Hz) and gamma (75-100 Hz) frequency bands and our results showed that beta power varied depending on grip type, whereas gamma power displayed clear epoch-related modulation. Strength and direction of inter-area connectivity varied depending on grip type and epoch. These findings suggest that fundamental control mechanisms are conserved across primates and, in future research, marmosets could represent an adequate model to investigate primate brain mechanisms. ABSTRACT: The cortical mechanisms of grasping have been extensively studied in macaques and humans. Here, we investigated whether common marmosets could rely on similar mechanisms despite striking differences in manual dexterity. Two common marmosets were trained to grasp-and-pull three objects eliciting different hand configurations: whole-hand, finger and scissor grips. The animals were then chronically implanted with 64-channel electrocorticogram arrays positioned over the left premotor, primary motor and somatosensory cortex. Power spectra, reflecting predominantly cortical activity, and phase-slope index, reflecting the direction of information flux, were studied in beta (16-35 Hz) and gamma (75-100 Hz) bands. Differences related to grip type, epoch (reach, grasp) and cortical area were statistically assessed. Results showed that whole-hand and scissor grips triggered stronger beta desynchronization than finger grip. Task epochs clearly modulated gamma power, especially for finger and scissor grips. Considering effective connectivity, finger and scissor grips evoked stronger outflow from primary motor to premotor cortex, whereas whole-hand grip displayed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that fundamental control mechanisms, relying on adjustments of cortical activity and connectivity, are conserved across primates. Consistently, marmosets could represent a good model to investigate primate brain mechanisms.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthPsychomotor PerformanceAnimalsBeta RhythmCallithrixConnectomeEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryGamma RhythmMaleSensorimotor Cortexelectrocorticography (ECoG)grip typemarmoset monkeymotor cortex

Identifiers

PMID28791721
PMCPMC5709338
OpenAlexW2745184613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.