Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791610›Full record

Trial reportUpdates in surgery2018

Pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing lightweight vs heavyweight mesh (Supermesh Study).

Stefano Bona, Riccardo Rosati, Enrico Opocher, Barbara Fiore, Marco Montorsi, SUPERMESH Study Group

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Updates in surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano BonaUO di Chirurgia Generale e Digestiva, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano (Milan), Italy. stefano.bona@humanitas.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2222-1707
Riccardo RosatiUO di Chirurgia Gastroenterologica, Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Enrico OpocherUO Chirurgia II Epato-Bilio-Pancreatica e Digestiva, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, 20142, Milan, Italy.
Barbara FioreUO di Chirurgia Generale e Digestiva, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.
Marco MontorsiUO di Chirurgia Generale e Digestiva, Humanitas Research Hospital and University, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.
SUPERMESH Study Group
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITHumanitas University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesh repair has significantly reduced recurrence rate after groin hernia surgery. Recently, attention has shifted to issues such as chronic pain and discomfort, leading to development of lightweight and partially re-absorbable meshes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of lightweight mesh vs heavyweight mesh on post-operative pain, discomfort and quality of life in short and medium term after inguinal hernia surgery. Eight hundred and eight patients with primary inguinal hernia were allocated to anterior repair (Lichtenstein technique) using a lightweight mesh (Ultrapro

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurgical MeshAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainInguinal hernia surgeryLichtenstein repairLightweight mesh

Identifiers

PMID28791610
OpenAlexW2743857278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.