ArticleClinical drug investigation2017
Age-Related Differences in Non-Persistence with Statin Treatment in Patients after a Transient Ischaemic Attack.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence to statins in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence and associated factors of non-adherence to antihyperlipidemic medication: a nationwide cross sectional survey in Pakistan.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Determinants of Non-Adherence to the Medications for Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Review
- Non-Adherence to Statin Treatment in Older Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease Depending on Persistence Status.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- Patient-Associated Characteristics Influencing the Risk for Non-Persistence with Statins in Older Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.Drugs & aging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveNon-persistence with secondary preventive measures, including medications such as statins, adversely affects the prospects of successful outcomes. This study was aimed at evaluating non-persistence with statin therapy in cohorts of young and elderly patients after a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and identifying patient-associated characteristics that influence the risk for non-persistence.
methodsThe study cohorts included 797 adult patients who were initiated on statin therapy following a TIA diagnosis between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2010. Patients were followed up for 3 years and those with a treatment gap of at least a 6-month period were considered 'non-persistent'. In order to identify any age-related differences, all analyses were conducted in the entire study cohort (n = 797) as well as separately in the 'younger' (aged <65 years, n = 267) and the 'older' (aged ≥65 years, n = 530) patients.
resultsNon-persistence was significantly more common in younger patients compared to older patients (67.8% vs. 49.1%; p < 0.001). Factors that decreased the probability of non-persistence in younger and older patients included diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72 and HR = 0.64, respectively) and hypercholesterolaemia (HR = 0.43 and HR = 0.62, respectively). Female gender (HR = 1.42) was associated with a higher and increasing number of medications taken (HR = 0.93), with lower probability for non-persistence in younger patients but not in the older patients.
conclusionsOur results indicate that certain patients with TIA require special counselling to improve persistence with statin therapy. These include younger patients, especially females and those not on polypharmacy, and both younger and older patients without diabetes mellitus or hypercholesterolaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.