Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2018
Feasibility of dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with subcutaneous pegfilgrastim 3.6 mg support: a single-center prospective study in Japan.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phase 1/2 Study of the Timing and Efficacy of 3 mg Peg-GCSF in Neo/Adjuvant Dose Dense Breast Cancer Treatment Protocols.South Asian journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Interstitial lung disease associated with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer: Tri-weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide: a retrospective observational study.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDose-dense chemotherapy consisting of a combination of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) improves the survival of patients with breast cancer. Although pegfilgrastim was used at a subcutaneous dose of 6.0 mg in a pivotal study of dose-dense EC treatment, pegfilgrastim at a dose of 3.6 mg has been approved in Japan. We have assessed the feasibility of dose-dense EC treatment supported with a 3.6 mg dose of pegfilgrastim by evaluating the relative dose intensity (RDI) and safety of the treatment, together with measuring the pegfilgrastim concentrations remaining on the day of starting the next cycle of chemotherapy.
methodsPatients with primary breast cancer received a total of 4 cycles of dose-dense EC treatment every 2 weeks, together with a subcutaneous injection of 3.6 mg pegfilgrastim on the day after chemotherapy. The serum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) concentrations were measured on the 15th day of every chemotherapy cycle.
resultsFrom March 2015 through to July 2016, a total of 51 patients (median age 51 years; range 33-73 years) were studied. The mean RDI was 95.2% (range 60.0-100%). Although most adverse events were consistent with those reported in previous studies, pneumocystis pneumonia developed in two patients during the following course of docetaxel treatment. The median serum G-CSF concentration was 92.5 (range 30.4-440) pg/ml.
conclusionsWith support provided by pegfilgrastim injection at a dose of 3.6 mg, dose-dense EC is feasible and associated with maintenance of a high RDI. There was no clinically significant accumulation of serum G-CSF concentrations associated with the use of a 3.6 mg dose of pegfilgrastim at 2-week intervals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.