Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791503›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2018

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophagogastric junction tumors: a single-center experience.

Joong Keun Kim, Gwang Ha Kim, Bong Eun Lee, Chul Hong Park, Hye Kyung Jeon, Dong Hoon Baek, Geun Am Song

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer: Upper GI Oncology Summit 2023.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The efficacy of the application of the curative criteria of the 5Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joong Keun KimDepartments of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Gwang Ha KimDepartments of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea. doc0224@pusan.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-5734
Bong Eun LeeDepartments of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Chul Hong ParkDepartments of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Hye Kyung JeonDepartments of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hoon BaekDepartments of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Geun Am SongDepartments of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Pusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical resection for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors is more aggressive and worsens the quality of life of the patients and leads to poor prognosis even after surgery compared with tumors in other sites of the stomach. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment modality for premalignant lesions and early cancers in the stomach. However, EGJ tumor is one of the most technically difficult lesions to resect by ESD. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of ESD for EGJ epithelial neoplasms and to assess the predictive factors for incomplete resection.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of 48 patients who underwent ESD for adenomas and early cancers of the EGJ between March 2006 and November 2015 at the Pusan National University Hospital. Therapeutic outcomes of ESD and procedure-related adverse events were analyzed.

resultsEn bloc resection, complete resection, and curative resection rates were 96, 77, and 71%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that the presence of ulceration was an independent predictive factor for incomplete resection (odds ratio 21.3, 95% confidence interval 1.51-298.49; p = 0.023). The procedure-related bleeding, perforation, and stenosis rates were 8, 4, and 0%, respectively; none of the adverse events required surgical intervention. During a median follow-up period of 25 months (range 6-72 months), local recurrence occurred in four patients with incomplete resection.

conclusionESD is an effective, safe, and feasible treatment for EGJ epithelial neoplasms. However, the complete resection rate decreases for tumors with ulceration.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEsophagogastric junctionNeoplasm

Identifiers

PMID28791503
OpenAlexW2744122999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.