Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791445›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017

Pre-operative factors influence the recovery of range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Philippe Collin, Tetsuya Matsukawa, Patrick J Denard, Solenn Gain, Alexandre Lädermann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predictors of Internal Rotation after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Philippe CollinCentre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto santé), boulevard Boutière 6, 35768, Saint-Grégoire Cedex, France.
Tetsuya MatsukawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Patrick J DenardSouthern Oregon Orthopedics, Medford, OR, USA.
Solenn GainCentre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto santé), boulevard Boutière 6, 35768, Saint-Grégoire Cedex, France.
Alexandre LädermannDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Rue J.-D. Maillard 3, 1217, Meyrin, Switzerland. alexandre.laedermann@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-8936
Centre Hospitalier privé Saint Grégoire · FRNagoya University · JPOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecently the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has increased because of a clinical perception of durable functional outcome. However, some patients unexpectedly have a poor recovery of range of motion (ROM) after surgery. Objective factors such as initial diagnosis, pre- and intra-operative ROM, deltoid impairment or arm lengthening have previously been associated with anterior forward flexion (AFF). This study sought to determine if subjective pre-operative factors influence the rate and timing of ROM recovery after RSA.

methodsBetween January 2011 to January 2012, all RSAs performed by a single surgeon were prospectively enrolled in this study. The cohort was divided into two groups based on AFF <90 or ≥90 after surgery. A multivariate analysis was performed to define independent predictive factors of post-operative ROM. Factors assessed included: age, sex, dominant arm, patient activity, body mass index (BMI), pre-operative diagnosis, deltoid status, pain and Constant scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV), simple shoulder test (SST) and radiographic findings. Patients were reviewed at six weeks, and three, six, 12 and 24 months.

resultsOne hundred and one RSAs were available for analysis. Poor post-operative AFF at six weeks was significantly related to poor pre-operative deltoid strength. Poor post-operative AFF at one-year follow-up was related to surgery of non-dominant arm, pre-operative poor AFF, pre-operative activity, poor subjective shoulder value (SSV), and a low contralateral Constant score. AFF and Constant score improved until six months and then plateaued. In contrast, both external and internal rotation continued to improve beyond six months after surgery.

conclusionsAFF and Constant scores after RSA plateau at six months after surgery whereas internal and external rotation continue to improve up to two years post operation. Several pre-operative factors including poor pre-operative AFF, surgery on the non-dominant arm, and lower SSV and Constant scores are correlated with post-operative ROM following RSA. Identification of these factors may be useful for counseling on functional expectations as well as customizing rehabilitation plans. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prospective Cohort Study, Treatment Study.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderCohort StudiesDeltoid MuscleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionRisk FactorsShoulder JointShoulder ProsthesisTreatment OutcomeActive forward flexionPostoperative functionPredicting factorsRange of motionResultsReverse shoulder arthroplastyShoulder prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID28791445
OpenAlexW2745186753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.