Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791331›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Temporal Processing in the Visual Cortex of the Awake and Anesthetized Rat.

Ida E J Aasebø, Mikkel E Lepperød, Maria Stavrinou, Sandra Nøkkevangen, Gaute Einevoll, Torkel Hafting, Marianne Fyhn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid Cortical Adaptation and the Role of Thalamic Synchrony during Wakefulness.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ida E J AasebøDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Mikkel E LepperødDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4262-5549
Maria StavrinouFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway.
Sandra NøkkevangenDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Gaute EinevollFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway.
Torkel HaftingInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0928-3487
Marianne FyhnDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activity pattern and temporal dynamics within and between neuron ensembles are essential features of information processing and believed to be profoundly affected by anesthesia. Much of our general understanding of sensory information processing, including computational models aimed at mathematically simulating sensory information processing, rely on parameters derived from recordings conducted on animals under anesthesia. Due to the high variety of neuronal subtypes in the brain, population-based estimates of the impact of anesthesia may conceal unit- or ensemble-specific effects of the transition between states. Using chronically implanted tetrodes into primary visual cortex (V1) of rats, we conducted extracellular recordings of single units and followed the same cell ensembles in the awake and anesthetized states. We found that the transition from wakefulness to anesthesia involves unpredictable changes in temporal response characteristics. The latency of single-unit responses to visual stimulation was delayed in anesthesia, with large individual variations between units. Pair-wise correlations between units increased under anesthesia, indicating more synchronized activity. Further, the units within an ensemble show reproducible temporal activity patterns in response to visual stimuli that is changed between states, suggesting state-dependent sequences of activity. The current dataset, with recordings from the same neural ensembles across states, is well suited for validating and testing computational network models. This can lead to testable predictions, bring a deeper understanding of the experimental findings and improve models of neural information processing. Here, we exemplify such a workflow using a Brunel network model.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnesthesiaAnestheticsAnimalsComputer SimulationCortical SynchronizationElectrodes, ImplantedIsofluraneMaleModels, NeurologicalNeuronsRats, Long-EvansTime FactorsVisual CortexVisual PerceptionWakefulnessAnestheticsIsofluraneanesthesiaawakecomputational modelingsingle unitstemporal sequencesvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID28791331
PMCPMC5547194
OpenAlexW2737688479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.