Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2017

Evaluation of Strategies to Control a Potential Outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Sweden.

Fernanda C Dórea, Maria Nöremark, Stefan Widgren, Jenny Frössling, Anette Boklund, Tariq Halasa, Karl Ståhl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernanda C DóreaDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria NöremarkDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Stefan WidgrenDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Jenny FrösslingDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Anette BoklundDepartment of Diagnostics and Scientific Advice, The National Veterinary Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tariq HalasaDepartment of Diagnostics and Scientific Advice, The National Veterinary Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karl StåhlDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To minimize the potential consequences of an introduction of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in Europe, European Union (EU) member states are required to present a contingency plan. This study used a simulation model to study potential outbreak scenarios in Sweden and evaluate the best control strategies. The model was informed by the Swedish livestock structure using herd information from cattle, pig, and small ruminant holdings in the country. The contact structure was based on animal movement data and studies investigating the movements between farms of veterinarians, service trucks, and other farm visitors. All scenarios of outbreak control included depopulation of detected herds, 3 km protection and 10 km surveillance zones, movement tracing, and 3 days national standstill. The effect of availability of surveillance resources, i.e., number of field veterinarians per day, and timeliness of enforcement of interventions, was assessed. With the estimated currently available resources, an FMD outbreak in Sweden is expected to be controlled (i.e., last infected herd detected) within 3 weeks of detection in any evaluated scenario. The density of farms in the area where the epidemic started would have little impact on the time to control the outbreak, but spread in high density areas would require more surveillance resources, compared to areas of lower farm density. The use of vaccination did not result in a reduction in the expected number of infected herds. Preemptive depopulation was able to reduce the number of infected herds in extreme scenarios designed to test a combination of worst-case conditions of virus introduction and spread, but at the cost of doubling the number of herds culled. This likely resulted from a combination of the small outbreaks predicted by the spread model, and the high efficacy of the basic control measures evaluated, under the conditions of the Swedish livestock industry, and considering the assumed control resources available. The results indicate that the duration and extent of FMD outbreaks could be kept limited in Sweden using the EU standard control strategy and a 3 days national standstill.

Indexed as

foot-and-mouth diseaseoutbreak controlsimulationspread modelstamping outvaccination

Identifiers

PMID28791298
PMCPMC5523145
OpenAlexW2737796245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.