Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791195›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2017

Nanoplasmonic Quantification of Tumor-derived Extracellular Vesicles in Plasma Microsamples for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring.

Kai Liang, Fei Liu, Jia Fan, Dali Sun, Chang Liu, Christopher J Lyon, David W Bernard, Yan Li, Kenji Yokoi, Matthew H Katz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. 80 years of extracellular vesicles: from discovery to clinical translation.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kai LiangDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Fei LiuDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Jia FanDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Dali SunDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Chang LiuSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Virginia G. Piper Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, 1001 S. McAllister Ave. B 130-B, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Christopher J LyonDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
David W BernardDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6565 Fannin St, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Yan LiInstitute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 15 Datum Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China.
Kenji YokoiDepartment of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Avenue, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Matthew H KatzDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Eugene J KoayDivision of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Zhen ZhaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Ye HuSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Virginia G. Piper Biodesign Center for Personalized Diagnostics, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, 1001 S. McAllister Ave. B 130-B, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.

Funding

Tissue ResourceP50CA126752 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MALCOLM K. BRENNER, HELEN E HESLOP · 2007 to 2026
$51.4M
TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143837 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FERRARI, MAURO · 2009 to 2014
$10.8M
Direct quantitation of the circulating Mtb-peptidome for pediatric TB managementR01HD090927 · NICHD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Christopher J Lyon, Charles DeBeaux Mitchell · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
Quantification of Circulating Antigens for Pediatric TB Diagnosis andTreatment MonitoringR01AI122932 · NIAID · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HU, TONY Y. · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
Real-time Detection of Active TB in HIV Exposed Children on CustomizedNanotrapR01AI113725 · NIAID · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LABAER, JOSHUA · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA126752NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143837NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI113725NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122932NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are of increasing interest as a resource of diagnostic biomarkers. However, most EV assays require large samples, are time-consuming, low-throughput and costly, and thus impractical for clinical use. Here, we describe a rapid, ultrasensitive and inexpensive nanoplasmon-enhanced scattering (nPES) assay that directly quantifies tumor-derived EVs from as little as 1 μL of plasma. The assay uses the binding of antibody-conjugated gold nanospheres and nanorods to EVs captured by EV-specific antibodies on a sensor chip to produce a local plasmon effect that enhances tumour-derived EV detection sensitivity and specificity. We identified a pancreatic cancer EV biomarker, ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EphA2), and demonstrate that an nPES assay for EphA2-EVs distinguishes pancreatic cancer patients from pancreatitis patients and healthy subjects. EphA2-EVs were also informative in staging tumour progression and in detecting early responses to neoadjuvant therapy, with better performance than a conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The nPES assay can be easily refined for clinical use, and readily adapted for diagnosis and monitoring of other conditions with disease-specific EV biomarkers.

Identifiers

PMID28791195
PMCPMC5543996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.