ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018
Raising the profile of pilot and feasibility studies in relation to the development, evaluation and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the FROM-16 in family members of patients receiving advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Implementing PROMS for elective surgery patients: feasibility, response rate, degree of recovery and patient acceptability.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- Protocol for implementation of the 'AusPROM' recommendations for elective surgery patients: a mixed-methods cohort study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Pilot implementation of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure for planning and monitoring participation-focused care in early intervention.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Community engagement to pilot electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROs) in early intervention: Lessons learned.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum to:2017
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This editorial introduces a new special series on the pilot and feasibility testing of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the on-line open access journal
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.