Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791176›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Ant queens increase their reproductive efforts after pathogen infection.

Julia Giehr, Anna V Grasse, Sylvia Cremer, Jürgen Heinze, Alexandra Schrempf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Capture rates ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A dynamic threshold model for terminal investment.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Navigating infection risk during oviposition and cannibalistic foraging in a holometabolous insect.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia GiehrZoology/Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8712-3510
Anna V GrasseIST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Sylvia CremerIST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Jürgen HeinzeZoology/Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-5946
Alexandra SchrempfZoology/Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9419-2776
University of Regensburg · DEInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections with potentially lethal pathogens may negatively affect an individual's lifespan and decrease its reproductive value. The terminal investment hypothesis predicts that individuals faced with a reduced survival should invest more into reproduction instead of maintenance and growth. Several studies suggest that individuals are indeed able to estimate their body condition and to increase their reproductive effort with approaching death, while other studies gave ambiguous results. We investigate whether queens of a perennial social insect (ant) are able to boost their reproduction following infection with an obligate killing pathogen. Social insect queens are special with regard to reproduction and aging, as they outlive conspecific non-reproductive workers. Moreover, in the ant

Indexed as

infectionreproductionsocial insectterminal investment

Identifiers

PMID28791176
PMCPMC5541571
OpenAlexW2728504984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.