Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791173›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Evolution of organismal stoichiometry in a long-term experiment with

Caroline B Turner, Brian D Wade, Justin R Meyer, Brooke A Sommerfeld, Richard E Lenski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Elemental Composition of Betel Leaves Using a Novel Optical Spectroscopic Technique.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-term experimental evolution decouples size and production costs inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Market forces determine the distribution of a leaky function in a simple microbial community.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline B TurnerEcology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1347-518X
Brian D WadeDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Justin R MeyerDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Brooke A SommerfeldDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Richard E LenskiEcology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organismal stoichiometry refers to the relative proportion of chemical elements in the biomass of organisms, and it can have important effects on ecological interactions from population to ecosystem scales. Although stoichiometry has been studied extensively from an ecological perspective, much less is known about the rates and directions of evolutionary changes in elemental composition. We measured carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus content of 12

Indexed as

carbon limitationEscherichia coliexperimental evolutionstoichiometry

Identifiers

PMID28791173
PMCPMC5541568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.