Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791139›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Global biogeographic patterns in bipolar moss species.

E M Biersma, J A Jackson, J Hyvönen, S Koskinen, K Linse, H Griffiths, P Convey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Phylogenetic Insights from a NovelPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

E M BiersmaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9877-2177
J A JacksonBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.
J HyvönenFinnish Museum of Natural History (Botany) and Viikki Plant Science Centre, Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 7, Helsinki FIN-00014, Finland.
S KoskinenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland.
K LinseBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.
H GriffithsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK.
P ConveyBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8497-9903
British Antarctic Survey · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A bipolar disjunction is an extreme, yet common, biogeographic pattern in non-vascular plants, yet its underlying mechanisms (vicariance or long-distance dispersal), origin and timing remain poorly understood. Here, combining a large-scale population dataset and multiple dating analyses, we examine the biogeography of four bipolar Polytrichales mosses, common to the Holarctic (temperate and polar Northern Hemisphere regions) and the Antarctic region (Antarctic, sub-Antarctic, southern South America) and other Southern Hemisphere (SH) regions. Our data reveal contrasting patterns, for three species were of Holarctic origin, with subsequent dispersal to the SH, while one, currently a particularly common species in the Holarctic (

Indexed as

bipolar disjunctionbryophytePolytrichaceaePolytrichastrum

Identifiers

PMID28791139
PMCPMC5541534
OpenAlexW2735053262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.