Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791066›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmic & vision research

Corneal Alterations Associated with Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Glaucoma: A Literature Review.

Joel R Palko, Owen Qi, Arsham Sheybani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Corneal and anterior segment parameters in patients with clinically unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Specular microscopy in clinical practice.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel R PalkoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Owen QiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mercy Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Arsham SheybaniDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USMercy Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic literature review was performed evaluating articles examining the effects of pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) and glaucoma (PEXG) on the cornea with a focus on the corneal endothelium. We searched for articles relevant to pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and corneal endothelial cell counts using Pubmed, Google Scholar Database, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases published prior to September of 2016. We then screened the references of these retrieved papers and performed a Web of Science cited reference search. Corneal characteristics analyzed included central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal nerve density, endothelial cell density (ECD), polymegathism, and pleomorphism. These parameters were compared in the following populations: control, PEX, PEXG, and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Over 30 observational studies were reviewed. Most studies showed a statistically significant lower ECD in PEX and PEXG populations compared to controls. Overall, PEX eyes had a non-statistically significant trend of lower ECDs compared to PEXG eyes. No consistent trends were found when analyzing differences in CCT amongst control, PEX and PEXG groups. For the few studies that looked at corneal nerve characteristics, the control groups were found to have statistically significantly greater nerve densities than PEX eyes, which had significantly greater densities than PEXG eyes. ECD and corneal nerve densities may be potential metrics for risk-stratifying patients with PEX and PEXG. Our literature review provided further evidence of the significant negative influence PEX has on the cornea, worsening as patients convert to PEXG.

Indexed as

Corneal Nerve DensityEndothelial Cell DensityPseudoexfoliation GlaucomaPseudoexfoliation Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID28791066
PMCPMC5525502
OpenAlexW2743586657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.