Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28791022›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2017

Enhancing Stability of Camelid and Shark Single Domain Antibodies: An Overview.

Ellen R Goldman, Jinny L Liu, Dan Zabetakis, George P Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Trends in nanobody radiotheranostics.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. NbThermo: a new thermostability database for nanobodies.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Application Progress of the Single Domain Antibody in Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Structural Classification of CDR-H3 in Single-Domain VMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellen R GoldmanCenter for BioMolecular Science and Engineering, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, United States.
Jinny L LiuCenter for BioMolecular Science and Engineering, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, United States.
Dan ZabetakisCenter for BioMolecular Science and Engineering, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, United States.
George P AndersonCenter for BioMolecular Science and Engineering, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single domain antibodies (sdAbs) are gaining a reputation as superior recognition elements as they combine the advantages of the specificity and affinity found in conventional antibodies with high stability and solubility. Melting temperatures (

Indexed as

camelidmelting temperatureprotein engineeringrefoldingsharksingle domain antibodystability

Identifiers

PMID28791022
PMCPMC5524736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.