Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28790932›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017

The Effects of Weaning Methods on Gut Microbiota Composition and Horse Physiology.

Núria Mach, Aline Foury, Sandra Kittelmann, Fabrice Reigner, Marco Moroldo, Maria Ballester, Diane Esquerré, Julie Rivière, Guillaume Sallé, Philippe Gérard and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Gut Microbiota of Ruminants and Monogastric Livestock: An Overview.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Comparison of Intestinal Microbiota of Blue Fox before and after Weaning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Transcriptomic signature related to poor welfare of sport horses.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Núria MachUMR 1313, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-SaclayJouy-en-Josas, France.
Aline FouryUMR 1286, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Bordeaux, Nutrition et Neurobiologie IntégréeBordeaux, France.
Sandra KittelmannAgResearch Ltd, Grasslands Research CentrePalmerston North, New Zealand.
Fabrice ReignerUMR 1282, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Infectiologie et Santé PubliqueNouzilly, France.
Marco MoroldoUMR 1313, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-SaclayJouy-en-Josas, France.
Maria BallesterDepartament de Genètica i Millora Animal, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries, Torre MarimonCaldes de Montbui, Spain.
Diane EsquerréUMR 444, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Plateforme GETCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Julie RivièreUMR 1313, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-SaclayJouy-en-Josas, France.
Guillaume SalléUMR 1282, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Infectiologie et Santé PubliqueNouzilly, France.
Philippe GérardUMR 1319, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-SaclayJouy-en-Josas, France.
Marie-Pierre MoisanUMR 1286, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Bordeaux, Nutrition et Neurobiologie IntégréeBordeaux, France.
Léa LansadePRC, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IFCE, Université de ToursNouzilly, France.
AgroParisTech · FRInfectiologie Animale et Santé Publique · FRNutriNeuro · FRAgResearch · NZLaboratoire de Génie Chimique · FRMicrobiologie de l’alimentation au service de la santé · FRPhysiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weaning has been described as one of the most stressful events in the life of horses. Given the importance of the interaction between the gut-brain axis and gut microbiota under stress, we evaluated (i) the effect of two different weaning methods on the composition of gut microbiota across time and (ii) how the shifts of gut microbiota composition after weaning affect the host. A total of 34 foals were randomly subjected to a progressive (P) or an abrupt (A) weaning method. In the P method, mares were separated from foals at progressively increasing intervals every day, starting from five min during the fourth week prior to weaning and ending with 6 h during the last week before weaning. In the A method, mares and foals were never separated prior to weaning (0 d). Different host phenotypes and gut microbiota composition were studied across 6 age strata (days -30, 0, 3, 5, 7, and 30 after weaning) by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results revealed that the beneficial species belonging to

Indexed as

gut microbiotahorsematernal separationstressweaning

Identifiers

PMID28790932
PMCPMC5524898
OpenAlexW2739171511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.