Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28790923›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017

Gut Microbiome Response to Sucralose and Its Potential Role in Inducing Liver Inflammation in Mice.

Xiaoming Bian, Liang Chi, Bei Gao, Pengcheng Tu, Hongyu Ru, Kun Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children and Young People Living With Overweight or Obesity: A Critical Narrative Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoming BianDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of GeorgiaAthens, GA, United States.
Liang ChiDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, United States.
Bei GaoDepartment of Environmental Health Science, University of GeorgiaAthens, GA, United States.
Pengcheng TuDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, United States.
Hongyu RuDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State UniversityRaleigh, NC, United States.
Kun LuDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Georgia · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Functional interaction between the gut microbiome and arsenic exposureR01ES024950 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LU, KUN · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sucralose is the most widely used artificial sweetener, and its health effects have been highly debated over the years. In particular, previous studies have shown that sucralose consumption can alter the gut microbiota. The gut microbiome plays a key role in processes related to host health, such as food digestion and fermentation, immune cell development, and enteric nervous system regulation. Inflammation is one of the most common effects associated with gut microbiome dysbiosis, which has been linked to a series of human diseases, such as diabetes and obesity. The aim of this study was to investigate the structural and functional effects of sucralose on the gut microbiota and associated inflammation in the host. In this study, C57BL/6 male mice received sucralose in their drinking water for 6 months. The difference in gut microbiota composition and metabolites between control and sucralose-treated mice was determined using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, functional gene enrichment analysis and metabolomics. Inflammatory gene expression in tissues was analyzed by RT-PCR. Alterations in bacterial genera showed that sucralose affects the gut microbiota and its developmental dynamics. Enrichment of bacterial pro-inflammatory genes and disruption in fecal metabolites suggest that 6-month sucralose consumption at the human acceptable daily intake (ADI) may increase the risk of developing tissue inflammation by disrupting the gut microbiota, which is supported by elevated pro-inflammatory gene expression in the liver of sucralose-treated mice. Our results highlight the role of sucralose-gut microbiome interaction in regulating host health-related processes, particularly chronic inflammation.

Indexed as

artificial sweetenergut microbiotainflammationmetabolomicssucralose

Identifiers

PMID28790923
PMCPMC5522834
OpenAlexW2739328078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.