Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28790911›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2017

Plasma Levels of Aβ42 and Tau Identified Probable Alzheimer's Dementia: Findings in Two Cohorts.

Lih-Fen Lue, Marwan N Sabbagh, Ming-Jang Chiu, Naomi Jing, Noelle L Snyder, Christopher Schmitz, Andre Guerra, Christine M Belden, Ta-Fu Chen, Che-Chuan Yang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease with Blood Test; Tempting but Challenging.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lih-Fen LueLaboratory of Neuroregeneration, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun CityAZ, United States.
Marwan N SabbaghCleo Roberts Center for Clinical Research, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun CityAZ, United States.
Ming-Jang ChiuDepartment of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan UniversityTaipei, Taiwan.
Naomi JingDepartment of Statistics, College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyCA, United States.
Noelle L SnyderBanner Alzheimer's Institute, PhoenixAZ, United States.
Christopher SchmitzArizona State University-Banner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Center, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, TempeAZ, United States.
Andre GuerraArizona State University-Banner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Center, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, TempeAZ, United States.
Christine M BeldenCleo Roberts Center for Clinical Research, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun CityAZ, United States.
Ta-Fu ChenDepartment of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan UniversityTaipei, Taiwan.
Che-Chuan YangMagQu Co. Ltd.New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Shieh-Yueh YangMagQu Co. Ltd.New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Douglas G WalkerLaboratory of Neuroregeneration, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun CityAZ, United States.
Kewei ChenBanner Alzheimer's Institute, PhoenixAZ, United States.
Eric M ReimanBanner Alzheimer's Institute, PhoenixAZ, United States.
Arizona State University · USBanner Alzheimer’s InstituteBanner Sun Health Research Institute · USNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USTranslational Genomics Research Institute · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of plasma amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau levels for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia has been controversial. The main objective of this study was to compare Aβ42 and tau levels measured by the ultra-sensitive immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) assays in plasma samples collected at the Banner Sun Health Institute (BSHRI) (United States) with those from the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) (Taiwan). Significant increase in tau levels were detected in AD subjects from both cohorts, while Aβ42 levels were increased only in the NTUH cohort. A regression model incorporating age showed that tau levels identified probable ADs with 81 and 96% accuracy in the BSHRI and NTUH cohorts, respectively, while computed products of Aβ42 and tau increased the accuracy to 84% in the BSHRI cohorts. Using 382.68 (pg/ml)

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloid βimmunomagnetic reduction assayplasmatau

Identifiers

PMID28790911
PMCPMC5522888
OpenAlexW2737741164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.