ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2017
Differences between Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in the Sensitivity of Tonically Active Neurons to Rewarding Events.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of ketamine on reward processing in depressive disorders: a systematic review of neuroimaging studies.CNS spectrums · 2026Pooled it
- Cognitive reappraisal of food and emotion cues involves common and unique neural contributions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The possible effect of inflammation on non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents with depression: a mediator of connectivity within corticostriatal reward circuitry.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025Article
- Distribution of Serotonergic Transporter Innervation in the Nucleus Accumbens and Ventral Pallidum Is Highly Conserved Among Primates.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025Article
- SMUG1 DNA glycosylase modulates reward behaviour through regulation of olfactory receptor gene expression.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Distinct spatially organized striatum-wide acetylcholine dynamics for the learning and extinction of Pavlovian associations.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Striatal function scrutinized through the PAN-TAN-FSI triumvirate.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- A mismatch between striatal cholinergic pauses and dopaminergic reward prediction errors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Insights into the interaction between time and reward prediction on the activity of striatal tonically active neurons: A pilot study in rhesus monkeys.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- The nucleus accumbens in reward and aversion processing: insights and implications.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Review
- Beta Oscillations in Monkey Striatum Encode Reward Prediction Error Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- A structural magnetic resonance imaging review of clinical motor outcomes from deep brain stimulation in movement disorders.Brain communications · 2023Review
- The cortico-striatal circuitry in autism-spectrum disorders: a balancing act.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Review
- Dopamine D2 receptors modulate the cholinergic pause and inhibitory learning.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Article
- Dorsal and ventral striatal functional connectivity shifts play a potential role in internet gaming disorder.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Whole-Brain Afferent Inputs to the Caudate Nucleus, Putamen, and Accumbens Nucleus in the Tree Shrew Striatum.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Article
- The Brain's Reward System in Health and Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Shared striatal activity in decisions to satisfy curiosity and hunger at the risk of electric shocks.Nature human behaviour · 2020Article
- Temporal Coding of Reward Value in Monkey Ventral Striatal Tonically Active Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within the striatum, cholinergic interneurons, electrophysiologically identified as tonically active neurons (TANs), represent a relatively homogeneous group in terms of their functional properties. They display typical pause in tonic firing in response to rewarding events which are of crucial importance for reinforcement learning. These responses are uniformly distributed throughout the dorsal striatum (i.e., motor and associative striatum), but it is unknown, at least in monkeys, whether differences in the modulation of TAN activity exist in the ventral striatum (i.e., limbic striatum), a region specialized for processing of motivational information. To address this issue, we examined the activity of dorsal and ventral TANs in two monkeys trained on a Pavlovian conditioning task in which a visual stimulus preceded the delivery of liquid reward by a fixed time interval. We found that the proportion of TANs responding to the stimulus predictive of reward did not vary significantly across regions (58%-80%), whereas the fraction of TANs responding to reward was higher in the limbic striatum (100%) compared to the motor (65%) and associative striatum (52%). By examining TAN modulation at the level of both the population and the individual neurons, we showed that the duration of pause responses to the stimulus and reward was longer in the ventral than in the dorsal striatal regions. Also, the magnitude of the pause was greater in ventral than dorsal striatum for the stimulus predictive of reward but not for the reward itself. We found similar region-specific differences in pause response duration to the stimulus when the timing of reward was less predictable (fixed replaced by variable time interval). Regional variations in the duration and magnitude of the pause response were transferred from the stimulus to reward when reward was delivered in the absence of any predictive stimulus. It therefore appears that ventral TANs exhibit stronger responses to rewarding stimuli, compared to dorsal TANs. The high proportion of responsive neurons, combined with particular response features, support the notion that the ventral TAN system can be driven by specific synaptic inputs arising from afferent sources distinct from those targeting the dorsal TAN system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.