ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2017
Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Dystonia.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Versatility of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Neuroplastic training-movement therapy: managing dystonia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Applications of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Understanding and Treating Dystonia.Advances in neurobiology · 2023Review
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Experimental Protocol to Test Explicit Motor Learning-Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021Article
- Altered sensory system activity and connectivity patterns in adductor spasmodic dysphonia.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Medical and Surgical Treatments for Dystonia.Neurologic clinics · 2020Review
- Lasting Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Writer's Cramp: A Case Report.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Motor and Perceptual Recovery in Adult Patients with Mild Intellectual Disability.Neural plasticity · 2018Article
- The Anatomical Basis for Dystonia: The Motor Network Model.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive methods for stimulating cortical neurons that have been increasingly used in the neurology realm and in the neurosciences applied to movement disorders. In addition, these tools have the potential to be delivered as clinically therapeutic approach. Despite several studies support this hypothesis, there are several limitations related to the extreme variability of the stimulation protocols, clinical enrolment and variability of rTMS and tDCS after effects that make clinical interpretation very difficult. Aim of the present study will be to critically discuss the state of art therapeutically applications of rTMS and tDCS in dystonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.