Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28790201›Full record

ArticlemBio2017

Division of Labor, Bet Hedging, and the Evolution of Mixed Biofilm Investment Strategies.

Nick Vallespir Lowery, Luke McNally, William C Ratcliff, Sam P Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Potential Use of Selected Natural Compounds with Anti-Biofilm Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Insights onMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Bet-hedging in innate and adaptive immune systems.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Multicellular behaviour enables cooperation in microbial cell aggregates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Structured environments fundamentally alter dynamics and stability of ecological communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nick Vallespir LoweryInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of the Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom nlowery@uoregon.edu sam.brown@biology.gatech.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7887-4179
Luke McNallyInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of the Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
William C RatcliffSchool of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sam P BrownInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of the Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom nlowery@uoregon.edu sam.brown@biology.gatech.edu.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT095831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial cells, like many other organisms, face a tradeoff between longevity and fecundity. Planktonic cells are fast growing and fragile, while biofilm cells are often slower growing but stress resistant. Here we ask why bacterial lineages invest simultaneously in both fast- and slow-growing types. We develop a population dynamic model of lineage expansion across a patchy environment and find that mixed investment is favored across a broad range of environmental conditions, even when transmission is entirely via biofilm cells. This mixed strategy is favored because of a division of labor where exponentially dividing planktonic cells can act as an engine for the production of future biofilm cells, which grow more slowly. We use experimental evolution to test our predictions and show that phenotypic heterogeneity is persistent even under selection for purely planktonic or purely biofilm transmission. Furthermore, simulations suggest that maintenance of a biofilm subpopulation serves as a cost-effective hedge against environmental uncertainty, which is also consistent with our experimental findings.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiofilmsBiological EvolutionGenetic FitnessAdaptation, PhysiologicalBacteriaEnvironmentModels, BiologicalPhenotypebiofilmsevolutionmicrobial ecology

Identifiers

PMID28790201
PMCPMC5550747
OpenAlexW2952352738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.