Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28790022›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2017

Usability Testing of the BRANCH Smartphone App Designed to Reduce Harmful Drinking in Young Adults.

Joanna Milward, Paolo Deluca, Colin Drummond, Rod Watson, Jacklyn Dunne, Andreas Kimergård

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. LionVu 2.0 Usability Assessment for Pennsylvania, United States.ISPRS international journal of geo-information · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna MilwardAddictions Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-6410
Paolo DelucaAddictions Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-7230
Colin DrummondAddictions Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9379-5452
Rod WatsonHealth Innovation Network, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6302-944X
Jacklyn DunneAddictions Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-5858
Andreas KimergårdAddictions Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-9865
King's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/13/86/03Department of Health RP-PG-0609-10162Medical Research Council G0701681Medical Research Council G0701818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic screening and brief intervention (eSBI) apps demonstrate potential to reduce harmful drinking. However, low user engagement rates with eSBI reduce overall effectiveness of interventions. As "Digital Natives," young adults have high expectations of app quality. Ensuring that the design, content, and functionality of an eSBI app are acceptable to young adults is an integral stage to the development process.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify usability barriers and enablers for an app, BRANCH, targeting harmful drinking in young adults.

methodsThe BRANCH app contains a drinking diary, alcohol reduction goal setting functions, normative drinking feedback, and information on risks and advice for cutting down. The app includes a social feature personalized to motivate cutting down and to promote engagement with a point-based system for usage. Three focus groups were conducted with 20 users who had tested the app for 1 week. A detailed thematic analysis was undertaken.

resultsThe first theme, "Functionality" referred to how users wanted an easy-to-use interface, with minimum required user-input. Poor functionality was considered a major usability barrier. The second theme, "Design" described how an aesthetic with minimum text, clearly distinguishable tabs and buttons and appealing infographics was integral to the level of usability. The final theme, "Content" described how participants wanted all aspects of the app to be automatically personalized to them, as well as providing them with opportunities to personalize the app themselves, with increased options for social connectivity.

conclusionsThere are high demands for apps such as BRANCH that target skilled technology users including young adults. Key areas to optimize eSBI app development that emerged from testing BRANCH with representative users include high-quality functionality, appealing aesthetics, and improved personalization.

Indexed as

alcoholappsbrief interventiondrinkingfocus groupmHealthusability testinguser experienceyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID28790022
PMCPMC5566629
OpenAlexW2743336945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.