ArticleOncology letters2017
IMP3 and p16 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A comparative immunohistochemical analysis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- GPS1 Exon 9 Mutations Represent a Rare Genetic Event in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- IMP3 Immunohistochemical Expression in Inverted Papilloma and Inverted Papilloma-Associated Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Expressions of IMP3 Versus DOG1 and p63 in Salivary Gland Tumors.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expression of p16 has been established as a good surrogate marker for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients, and it has been associated with an improved prognosis, irrespective of the actual HPV status. Conversely, the human insulin-like growth factor II mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) has been related to aggressiveness in several types of tumors. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare p16 and IMP3 as markers of favorable and unfavorable behavior, respectively, in head and neck SCC (HNSCC), with particular reference to the HPV status. Both markers were analyzed by immunohistochemical analysis of 156 HNSCC samples originating from the oropharynx (n=81), oral cavity (n=44), larynx (n=15), hypopharynx (n=10) and nasopharynx (n=6). The HPV status was examined in a randomly selected representative subcohort (n=38) using polymerase chain reaction. Of the 156 HNSCC samples, 81 (51.9%) and 54 (34.6%) were positive for IMP3 and p16, respectively. IMP3 expression (P=0.022), p16 expression (P<0.001) and the combination of these markers (P<0.001) were significantly associated with tumor site. In particular, 69/81 (85%) OPSCC samples were positive for either one or both markers compared with 36/75 (48%) SCC samples from other sites. p16 expression was significantly associated with HPV infection (P=0.017) and a trend towards a negative association between IMP3 expression and HPV infection was observed (P=0.053). The results of the present study suggested that IMP3 and p16 are more frequently expressed in OPSCC compared with other HNSCCs. The prognostic impact of IMP3 on OPSCC remains to be investigated in a larger series with an extended follow-up period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.