Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28789388›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2017

Outcome predictors for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who undergo gastrectomy and S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Yoshinori Fujiwara, Shuichi Fukuda, Masanori Tsujie, Kotaro Kitani, Keisuke Inoue, Tomonori Hayashi, Hajime Ishikawa, Masao Yukawa, Masatoshi Inoue

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nutritional literacy of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer based on Nutbeam's health literacy model: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshinori FujiwaraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Shuichi FukudaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Masanori TsujieDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Kotaro KitaniDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Keisuke InoueDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Tomonori HayashiDepartment of Pharmacy, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Hajime IshikawaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Masao YukawaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Masatoshi InoueDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nara Hospital, Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Nara 630-0293, Japan.
Kindai University · JPNara Medical University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictors of survival in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer (GC) who received tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) subsequent to gastrectomy were examined. Additionally, the association between dose intensity of S-1 and survival rate was investigated. A total of 62 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer were retrospectively evaluated, each of whom had received a curative D2 gastrectomy and S-1 ACT. The relative performance (RP; administered/planned S-1 doses ×100%), body mass index (BMI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and body weight (BW) were calculated, and the association of survival with these factors and other clinicopathological parameters was examined. The 1-year treatment continuation rate for S-1 was 94.2%, excluding patients who experienced cancer recurrences during their ACT year. The initial S-1 reduction rate was 38.7%. Patients with stage II/IIIA disease exhibited significantly improved 5-year overall survival rates compared with patients with stage IIIB GC, 81.6/73.7 vs. 33.8% (P<0.01). No association between RP and survival was observed. BMI, BW and PNI were significantly decreased following surgery compared with preoperative states. In the univariate analysis, postoperative BW loss (BMI loss), pathological stage and >7 lymph node metastases were significantly associated with outcome (P<0.05); in the multivariate analysis, postoperative BW loss >10.6% and pathological stages were independent prognostic factors for survival. Continuing S-1 ACT for the full year exhibited a greater effect on survival compared with dosage. Early postoperative nutritional deterioration may decrease the survival rates in these patients.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapygastric cancersurvival predictorstegafur/gimeracil/oteracil

Identifiers

PMID28789388
PMCPMC5529945
OpenAlexW2618776276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.