ArticleOncology letters2017
Detection and management of retroperitoneal cystic lesions: A case report and review of the literature.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Laparoscopic Resection of a Rare Retroperitoneal Dermoid Cyst in a 78-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- A road to surgical success: a case report of huge retroperitoneal idiopathic non-pancreatic cyst in a 6-year-old child at tertiary hospital, Muhimbili National Hospital.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Review of diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and management of retroperitoneal lymphangioma.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: A case report with review of literature.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- A huge retroperitoneal cyst with a rare clinical presentation.Journal of surgical case reports · 2022Article
- Huge pelvic retroperitoneal cyst masquerading as hydrosalpinx: A case report with review of the literature.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- Mixed serous and mucinous retroperitoneal cystadenoma: an extremely rare case.Journal of surgical case reports · 2021Article
- Retroperitoneal teratoma misdiagnosed as a gastric stromal tumor: A case report.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Rare huge retroperitoneal cystic lymphangioma presenting as acute abdomen in an adult.BJR case reports · 2018Article
- Practical approach to primary retroperitoneal masses in adults.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of cystic lesions within the retroperitoneal space is a rare event that poses clinicians the challenge of a difficult diagnosis and disease management. Retroperitoneal cystic lesions account for a group of lesions that range from common benign lesions (e.g., lymphoceles developing as a surgical complication) to rare aggressive malignant neoplasms. Currently, in the majority of cases, image-guided procedures allow for a pathological diagnosis to be achieved in these challenging lesions, thus offering the chance of an appropriate treatment; however, the overall clinical assessment of retroperitoneal cysts is highly demanding. The present study reports the management of a representative clinical case, presenting with a voluminous cystic mass able to dislocate cave vein, whose diagnosis was preceded by a deep vein thrombosis. Computed tomography-scan and ultrasound guided percutaneous drainage were performed to achieve the diagnosis. Following the discussion of the current case report, a review of the pathological and radiological characteristics of retroperitoneal cystic lesions is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.