Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28789370›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2017

Morphological response contributes to patient selection for rescue liver resection in chemotherapy patients with initially un-resectable colorectal liver metastasis.

Koichi Suzuki, Yuta Muto, Kosuke Ichida, Taro Fukui, Yuji Takayama, Nao Kakizawa, Takaharu Kato, Fumi Hasegawa, Fumiaki Watanabe, Yuji Kaneda and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Koichi SuzukiDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Yuta MutoDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Kosuke IchidaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Taro FukuiDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Yuji TakayamaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Nao KakizawaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Takaharu KatoDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Fumi HasegawaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Fumiaki WatanabeDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Yuji KanedaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Rina KikukawaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Masaaki SaitoDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Shingo TsujinakaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Kazushige FutsuharaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Osamu TakataDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Hiroshi NodaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Yasuyuki MiyakuraDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Hirokazu KiyozakiDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Fumio KonishiDepartment of Surgery, Nerima-Hikarigaoka Hospital, Tokyo 179-0072, Japan.
Toshiki RikiyamaDepartment of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama 330-8503, Japan.
Jichi Medical University · JPJichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPMidorigaoka Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphological response is considered an improved surrogate to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) model with regard to predicting the prognosis for patients with colorectal liver metastases. However, its use as a decision-making tool for surgical intervention has not been examined. The present study assessed the morphological response in 50 patients who underwent chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for initially un-resectable colorectal liver metastases. Changes in tumor morphology between heterogeneous with uncertain borders and homogeneous with clear borders were defined as an optimal response (OR). Patients were also assessed as having an incomplete response (IR), and an absence of marked changes was assessed as no response (NR). No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) between complete response/partial response (CR/PR) and stable disease/progressive disease (SD/PD), according to RECIST. By contrast, PFS for OR/IR patients was significantly improved compared with that for NR patients (13.2 vs. 8.7 months; P=0.0426). Exclusion of PD enhanced the difference in PFS between OR/IR and NR patients (15.1 vs. 9.3 months; P<0.0001), whereas no difference was observed between CR/PR and SD. The rate of OR and IR in patients treated with bevacizumab was 47.4% (9/19), but only 19.4% (6/31) for patients that were not administered bevacizumab. Comparison of the survival curves between OR/IR and NR patients revealed similar survival rates at 6 months after chemotherapy, but the groups exhibited different survival rates subsequent to this period of time. Patients showing OR/IR within 6 months appeared to be oncologically stable and could be considered as candidates for surgical intervention, including rescue liver resection. Comparing the pathological and morphological features of the tumor with representative optimal response, living tumor cells were revealed to be distributed within the area of vascular reconstruction induced by bevacizumab, resulting in a predictive value for prognosis in the patients treated with bevacizumab. The present findings provided the evidence for physicians to consider patients with previously un-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer as candidates for surgical treatment. Morphological response is a useful decision-making tool for evaluating these patients for rescue liver resection following chemotherapy.

Indexed as

bevacizumabcolorectal liver metastasismorphological responserescue liver resectionResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

Identifiers

PMID28789370
PMCPMC5529781
OpenAlexW2623257476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.