ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2014
Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Immunosensors for Clinically Significant Biomarkers.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the advancement on colorimetric nanobiosensors for SARS-CoV-2 detection.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2023Pooled it
- Recent Advancements and Applications of Nanosensors in Oral Health: Revolutionizing Diagnosis and Treatment.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Recent Trends of Bioanalytical Sensors with Smart Health Monitoring Systems: From Materials to Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Amperometric Inkjet-Printed Thyroxine Sensor Based on Customized Graphene and Tunned Cyclodextrins as the Preconcentration Element.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Recent Trends in Electrochemical Sensors for Vital Biomedical Markers Using Hybrid Nanostructured Materials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Review
- Applications of Graphene Quantum Dots in Biomedical Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Electrochemical biosensors: perspective on functional nanomaterials for on-site analysis.Biomaterials research · 2020Review
- Graphene Quantum Dot-Based Electrochemical Immunosensors for Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Nanomaterial-Modified Conducting Paper: Fabrication, Properties, and Emerging Biomedical Applications.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2019Review
- Recent progress in nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for pathogenic bacteria.Mikrochimica acta · 2019Review
- Engineered Gold-Based Nanomaterials: Morphologies and Functionalities in Biomedical Applications. A Mini Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Electrochemical Immunosensor Based on Nanoelectrode Ensembles for the Serological Analysis of IgG-type Tissue Transglutaminase.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Current Technologies of Electrochemical Immunosensors: Perspective on Signal Amplification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Molecular Biosensors for Electrochemical Detection of Infectious Pathogens in Liquid Biopsies: Current Trends and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Non-Invasive Breast Cancer Diagnosis through Electrochemical Biosensing at Different Molecular Levels.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Immunosensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Electrochemical Genosensing of Circulating Biomarkers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Electrochemical Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide by Inhibiting the p-Benzenediboronic Acid-Triggered Assembly of Citrate-Capped Au/Ag Nanoparticles on Electrode Surface.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Diagnostics Strategies with Electrochemical Affinity Biosensors Using Carbon Nanomaterials as Electrode Modifiers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has played a crucial role in the development of biosensors over the past decade. The development, testing, optimization, and validation of new biosensors has become a highly interdisciplinary effort involving experts in chemistry, biology, physics, engineering, and medicine. The sensitivity, the specificity and the reproducibility of biosensors have improved tremendously as a result of incorporating nanomaterials in their design. In general, nanomaterials-based electrochemical immunosensors amplify the sensitivity by facilitating greater loading of the larger sensing surface with biorecognition molecules as well as improving the electrochemical properties of the transducer. The most common types of nanomaterials and their properties will be described. In addition, the utilization of nanomaterials in immunosensors for biomarker detection will be discussed since these biosensors have enormous potential for a myriad of clinical uses. Electrochemical immunosensors provide a specific and simple analytical alternative as evidenced by their brief analysis times, inexpensive instrumentation, lower assay cost as well as good portability and amenability to miniaturization. The role nanomaterials play in biosensors, their ability to improve detection capabilities in low concentration analytes yielding clinically useful data and their impact on other biosensor performance properties will be discussed. Finally, the most common types of electroanalytical detection methods will be briefly touched upon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.