Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28788131›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2014

Blends and Nanocomposite Biomaterials for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Azadehsadat Hashemi Doulabi, Kibret Mequanint, Hadi Mohammadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Tribomechanical Properties of PVA/NomexGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Photocurable Polymeric Blends for Surgical Application.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Biofabrication for osteochondral tissue regeneration: bioink printability requirements.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Azadehsadat Hashemi DoulabiSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada. hashemi.azadeh@gmail.com.
Kibret MequanintDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, the University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada. kmequani@uwo.ca.
Hadi MohammadiSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada. hadi.mohammadi@ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive assessment on polymer blends and nanocomposite systems for articular cartilage tissue engineering applications. Classification of various types of blends including natural/natural, synthetic/synthetic systems, their combination and nanocomposite biomaterials are studied. Additionally, an inclusive study on their characteristics, cell responses ability to mimic tissue and regenerate damaged articular cartilage with respect to have functionality and composition needed for native tissue, are also provided.

Indexed as

articular cartilagebiomaterialblendnanocompositetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID28788131
PMCPMC5455822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.