Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28787507›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2017

Effect of Levosimendan on Low Cardiac Output Syndrome in Patients With Low Ejection Fraction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: The LICORN Randomized Clinical Trial.

Bernard Cholley, Thibaut Caruba, Sandrine Grosjean, Julien Amour, Alexandre Ouattara, Judith Villacorta, Bertrand Miguet, Patrick Guinet, François Lévy, Pierre Squara and 18 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02184819 phase3completednot on this map

Effects of Levosimendan Pretreatment in Patients With Low Ejection Fraction (40 % or Less) Undergoing CABG: a Randomised, Double Blind, Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2013 to 2015Enrolled335ConditionsCoronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Left Ventricular DysfonctionArmslevosimendan, Placebo
NCT04635293 nacompletednot on this map

Preoperative Infusion of Levosimendan in High Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Retrospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAretaieion University HospitalRan2012 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsCardiac Disease, Cardiac Failure, Cardiac Surgery, InotropesArmspreoperative infusion of levosimendan, no preoperative infusion of levosimendan
NCT05685537 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Levosimendan Preconditioning on Critical Care and In-hospital Lengths of Stay After Cardiac Surgery With Bypass Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2022 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsLevosimendan, Cardiac Surgery, Cardiopulmonary BypassArmsLevosimendan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Perioperative Clinical Trials in AKI.Seminars in nephrology · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Bernard CholleyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, and University Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Thibaut CarubaDepartment of Pharmacy, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, and University Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sandrine GrosjeanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon-Bourgogne, France.
Julien AmourDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, and University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Alexandre OuattaraDepartment Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care II, Magellan Medico-Surgical Center, and University of Bordeaux, INSERM, UMR 1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bordeaux, France.
Judith VillacortaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France.
Bertrand MiguetDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Laënnec, Nantes, France.
Patrick GuinetDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
François LévyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France.
Pierre SquaraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Clinique Ambroise Paré, Neuilly, France.
Nora Aït HamouDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, and University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Aude CarillionDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, and University Pierre & Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Julie BoyerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon-Bourgogne, France.
Marie-Fazia BoughenouDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, and University Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Sebastien RosierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Emmanuel RobinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France.
Mihail RadutoiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, CHU Côte de Nacre, Caen, France.
Michel DurandDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Catherine GuidonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, CHU La Timone, Marseille, France.
Olivier DesebbeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel and INSERM U1060, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
Anaïs Charles-NelsonDepartment of Biostatistics, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, and University Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Philippe MenaschéDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, and University Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Bertrand RozecDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Laënnec, Nantes, France.
Claude GirardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon-Bourgogne, France.
Jean-Luc FellahiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel and INSERM U1060, University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
Romain PirracchioDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, and University Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Gilles ChatellierDepartment of Biostatistics, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, and University Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
-
Université Paris Cité · FRCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRSorbonne Université · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital Laennec · FRHôpital Pontchaillou · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRClinique Ambroise Paré · FRHôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRHôpital Claude Huriez · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Objective: To assess the ability of preoperative levosimendan to prevent postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 13 French cardiac surgical centers. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 40% and scheduled for isolated or combined coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled from June 2013 until May 2015 and followed during 6 months (last follow-up, November 30, 2015). Interventions: Patients were assigned to a 24-hour infusion of levosimendan 0.1 µg/kg/min (n = 167) or placebo (n = 168) initiated after anesthetic induction. Main Outcomes and Measures: Composite end point reflecting low cardiac output syndrome with need for a catecholamine infusion 48 hours after study drug initiation, need for a left ventricular mechanical assist device or failure to wean from it at 96 hours after study drug initiation when the device was inserted preoperatively, or need for renal replacement therapy at any time postoperatively. It was hypothesized that levosimendan would reduce the incidence of this composite end point by 15% in comparison with placebo. Results: Among 336 randomized patients (mean age, 68 years; 16% women), 333 completed the trial. The primary end point occurred in 87 patients (52%) in the levosimendan group and 101 patients (61%) in the placebo group (absolute risk difference taking into account center effect, -7% [95% CI, -17% to 3%]; P = .15). Predefined subgroup analyses found no interaction with ejection fraction less than 30%, type of surgery, and preoperative use of β-blockers, intra-aortic balloon pump, or catecholamines. The prevalence of hypotension (57% vs 48%), atrial fibrillation (50% vs 40%), and other adverse events did not significantly differ between levosimendan and placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with low ejection fraction who were undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass, levosimendan compared with placebo did not result in a significant difference in the composite end point of prolonged catecholamine infusion, use of left ventricular mechanical assist device, or renal replacement therapy. These findings do not support the use of levosimendan for this indication. Trial Registration: EudraCT Number: 2012-000232-25; clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02184819.

Indexed as

PremedicationAgedCardiac Output, LowCardiopulmonary BypassCardiotonic AgentsCatecholaminesCoronary Artery BypassDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart-Assist DevicesHumansHydrazonesInfusions, IntravenousIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedCardiotonic AgentsCatecholaminesHydrazonesPyridazinesSimendan

Identifiers

PMID28787507
PMCPMC5817482
OpenAlexW2743439773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.