ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Computational-experimental approach to drug-target interaction mapping: A case study on kinase inhibitors.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- End-to-End Intelligent Drug Discovery via a Scalable and Explainable Graph-Transformer Framework.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Venom-Derived Enzyme Inhibitors as Anticancer Agents: Structure-Activity Relationships, Molecular Targets and Mechanistic Insights.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Proteome-wide prediction of interactions between structured domains and peptide motifs reveals functionally coherent subnetworks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Phytochemicals Daturilinol and Withametelin B identified as novel Bcl2 inhibitors via virtual screening and molecular simulations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DTIAM: a unified framework for predicting drug-target interactions, binding affinities and drug mechanisms.Nature communications · 2025Article
- KinasePred: A Computational Tool for Small-Molecule Kinase Target Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Docking-Informed Machine Learning for Kinome-wide Affinity Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- ERL-ProLiGraph: Enhanced representation learning on protein-ligand graph structured data for binding affinity prediction.Molecular informatics · 2024Article
- Leveraging multiple data types for improved compound-kinase bioactivity prediction.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Attention-based approach to predict drug-target interactions across seven target superfamilies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A review of deep learning methods for ligand based drug virtual screening.Fundamental research · 2024Review
- Towards explainable interaction prediction: Embedding biological hierarchies into hyperbolic interaction space.PloS one · 2024Article
- LSTM-SAGDTA: Predicting Drug-target Binding Affinity with an Attention Graph Neural Network and LSTM Approach.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Article
- Calibrated geometric deep learning improves kinase-drug binding predictions.Nature machine intelligence · 2023Article
- Prediction of the interaction betweenHeliyon · 2023Article
- DGDTA: dynamic graph attention network for predicting drug-target binding affinity.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Poor Generalization by Current Deep Learning Models for Predicting Binding Affinities of Kinase Inhibitors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to relatively high costs and labor required for experimental profiling of the full target space of chemical compounds, various machine learning models have been proposed as cost-effective means to advance this process in terms of predicting the most potent compound-target interactions for subsequent verification. However, most of the model predictions lack direct experimental validation in the laboratory, making their practical benefits for drug discovery or repurposing applications largely unknown. Here, we therefore introduce and carefully test a systematic computational-experimental framework for the prediction and pre-clinical verification of drug-target interactions using a well-established kernel-based regression algorithm as the prediction model. To evaluate its performance, we first predicted unmeasured binding affinities in a large-scale kinase inhibitor profiling study, and then experimentally tested 100 compound-kinase pairs. The relatively high correlation of 0.77 (p < 0.0001) between the predicted and measured bioactivities supports the potential of the model for filling the experimental gaps in existing compound-target interaction maps. Further, we subjected the model to a more challenging task of predicting target interactions for such a new candidate drug compound that lacks prior binding profile information. As a specific case study, we used tivozanib, an investigational VEGF receptor inhibitor with currently unknown off-target profile. Among 7 kinases with high predicted affinity, we experimentally validated 4 new off-targets of tivozanib, namely the Src-family kinases FRK and FYN A, the non-receptor tyrosine kinase ABL1, and the serine/threonine kinase SLK. Our sub-sequent experimental validation protocol effectively avoids any possible information leakage between the training and validation data, and therefore enables rigorous model validation for practical applications. These results demonstrate that the kernel-based modeling approach offers practical benefits for probing novel insights into the mode of action of investigational compounds, and for the identification of new target selectivities for drug repurposing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.