ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017
Tumour mutation status and sites of metastasis in patients with cutaneous melanoma.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Older melanoma patients aged 75 and above retain responsiveness to anti-PD1 therapy: results of a retrospective single-institution cohort study.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2018Trial
- After a Decade of Therapy Revolution in Cutaneous Melanoma-Perspectives on Emerging Treatment Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Molecular Underpinnings of Brain Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Non-coding RNAs in BRAF-mutant melanoma: targets, indicators, and therapeutic potential.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Melanoma in Peru: 1000 patients and 10 years of experience.PloS one · 2025Article
- Malignant melanoma bone marrow infiltration induced coagulation dysfunction and spinal epidural haematoma with paraplegia: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Lack of Influence of Non-Overlapping Mutations inCancers · 2023Article
- Hepatic passaging of NRAS-mutant melanoma influences adhesive properties and metastatic pattern.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Clinical features and response to systemic therapy in NRAS-mutant Chinese melanoma patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- An update on methods for detection of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in melanoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Factors influencing acceptance, adoption and adherence to sentinel node biopsy recommendations in the Australian Melanoma Management Guidelines: a qualitative study using an implementation science framework.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Living Bacteria-Based Immuno-Photodynamic Therapy: Metabolic Labeling of Clostridium butyricum for Eradicating Malignant Melanoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- The Genetics of Early-Stage Melanoma in a Veteran Population.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Genomic and Transcriptomic Underpinnings of Melanoma Genesis, Progression, and Metastasis.Cancers · 2021Review
- Prognostic Roles ofCells · 2021Article
- Article
- BRAF Gene and Melanoma: Back to the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCutaneous melanoma can metastasise haematogenously and/or lymphogenously to form satellite/in-transit, lymph node or distant metastasis. This study aimed to determine if BRAF and NRAS mutant and wild-type tumours differ in their site of first tumour metastasis and anatomical metastatic pathway.
methodsProspective cohort of patients with a histologically confirmed primary cutaneous melanoma at three tertiary referral centres in Melbourne, Australia from 2010 to 2015. Multinomial regression determined clinical, histological and mutational factors associated with the site of first metastasis and metastatic pathway.
resultsOf 1048 patients, 306 (29%) developed metastasis over a median 4.7 year follow-up period. 73 (24%), 192 (63%) and 41 (13%) developed distant, regional lymph node and satellite/in-transit metastasis as the first site of metastasis, respectively. BRAF mutation was associated with lymph node metastasis (adjusted RRR 2.46 95% CI 1.07-5.69, P=0.04) and sentinel lymph node positivity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.14-2.10, P=0.005). BRAF mutation and NRAS mutation were associated with increased odds of developing liver metastasis (aOR 3.09, 95% CI 1.49-6.42, P=0.003; aOR 3.17, 95% CI 1.32-7.58, P=0.01) and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (aOR 4.65, 95% CI 2.23-9.69, P<0.001; aOR 4.03, 95% CI 1.72-9.44, P=0.001). NRAS mutation was associated with lung metastasis (aOR 2.44, 95% CI 1.21-4.93, P=0.01).
conclusionsBRAF mutation was found to be associated with lymph node metastasis as first metastasis and sentinel lymph node positivity. BRAF and NRAS mutations were associated with CNS and liver metastasis and NRAS mutation with lung metastasis. If these findings are validated in additional prospective studies, a role for heightened visceral organ surveillance may be warranted in patients with tumours harbouring these somatic mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.