ArticleNature biotechnology2017
Rules of the road for insect gene drive research and testing.
Abstract read
In one paragraph
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A typology of community and stakeholder engagement based on documented examples in the field of novel vector control.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Pooled it
- From resistance to remedy: the role of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats system in combating antimicrobial resistance-a review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Transgene removal using an in cis programmed homing endonuclease via single-strand annealing in the mosquito Aedes aegypti.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Modelling daisy quorum drive: A short-term bridge across engineered fitness valleys.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Manipulating the Destiny of Wild Populations Using CRISPR.Annual review of genetics · 2023Review
- Evaluating the Mating Competency of Genetically Modified Male Mosquitoes in Laboratory Conditions.Frontiers in tropical diseases · 2023Article
- Use of Insect Promoters in Genetic Engineering to Control Mosquito-Borne Diseases.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Lessons learned from the introduction of genetically engineered crops: relevance to gene drive deployment in Africa.Transgenic research · 2022Review
- Article
- Propagation of seminal toxins through binary expression gene drives could suppress populations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Containment Practices for Arthropods Modified with Engineered Transgenes Capable of Gene Drive Addendum 1 to the Arthropod Containment Guidelines, Version 3.2.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Gene drives gaining speed.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- California Residents' Perceptions of Gene Drive Systems to Control Mosquito-Borne Disease.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Oxitec and MosquitoMate in the United States: lessons for the future of gene drive mosquito control.Pathogens and global health · 2021Article
- CRISPR: The Multidrug Resistance Endgame?Molecular biotechnology · 2021Review
- Combating mosquito-borne diseases using genetic control technologies.Nature communications · 2021Review
- Optimized CRISPR tools and site-directed transgenesis towards gene drive development in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Inherently confinable split-drive systems in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Article
- Making gene drive biodegradable.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Zach AdelmanTexas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Omar AkbariUniversity of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
John BauerUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Ethan BierUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Cinnamon BlossUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Sarah R CarterScience Policy Consulting LLC, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Craig CallenderUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Adriana Costero-Saint DenisNIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. USA.
Peter CowheyUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Brinda DassUS Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Jason DelborneNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Mary DevereauxUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Peter EllsworthLegler Benbough Foundation, San Diego, California, USA.
Robert M FriedmanJ. Craig Venter Institute, San Diego, California, USA.
Valentino GantzUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Clark GibsonUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Bruce A HayCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Mark HoddleUniversity of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Anthony A JamesUniversity of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Stephanie JamesFoundation for NIH, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Lyric JorgensonOffice of Science Policy, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Michael KalichmanUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
John MarshallUniversity of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
William McGinnisUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jack NewmanZagaya Foundation, Emeryville, California, USA.
Alan PearsonAnimal Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.
Hector QuemadaDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Larisa RudenkoUS Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Anthony SheltonCornell University, Geneva, New York, USA.
Joseph M VinetzUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Jennifer WeismanStrategic Analysis, Inc., Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Brenda WongUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Chris WozniakUS Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
Funding
Sugar-feeding behavior of the malaria vector Nyssorhynchus darlingi and development of effective attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB) to increase intervention success in PeruU19AI089681 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI VINETZ, JOSEPH M. · 2010 to 2023
$20.1MThe mutagenic chain reaction: a method for autocatalyic gene disseminationR01GM117321 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BIER, ETHAN · 2016 to 2024
$2.5MThe Molecular Genetics of Early NeurogenesisR56NS029870 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BIER, ETHAN · 2013 to 2013
$392kAnalyzing Anthrax Toxins in DrosophiliaR56AI070654 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BIER, ETHAN · 2013 to 2013
$364kNIAID NIH HHS R56 AI070654NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089681NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117321NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS029870
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390
Registered trials
None linked
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.