Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28787388›Full record

Trial reportThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2018

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Lactobacillus acidophilus for the Treatment of Acute Watery Diarrhea in Vietnamese Children.

Tran Thi Hong Chau, Nguyen Ngoc Minh Chau, Nhat Thanh Hoang Le, Hao Chung The, Phat Voong Vinh, Nguyen Thi Nguyen To, Nguyen Minh Ngoc, Ha Manh Tuan, Tang Le Chau Ngoc, Marion-Eliette Kolader and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pathogen-Specific Effects of Probiotics in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis Seeking Emergency Care: A Randomized Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tran Thi Hong Chau
Nguyen Ngoc Minh Chau
Nhat Thanh Hoang Le
Hao Chung The
Phat Voong Vinh
Nguyen Thi Nguyen To
Nguyen Minh Ngoc
Ha Manh Tuan
Tang Le Chau Ngoc
Marion-Eliette Kolader
Jeremy J Farrar
Marcel Wolbers
Guy E Thwaites
Stephen Baker
Oxford-Vietnam Probiotics Study Group

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProbiotics are the most frequently prescribed treatment for children hospitalized with diarrhea in Vietnam. We were uncertain of the benefits of probiotics for the treatment of acute watery diarrhea in Vietnamese children.

methodsWe conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of children hospitalized with acute watery diarrhea in Vietnam. Children meeting the inclusion criteria (acute watery diarrhea) were randomized to receive either 2 daily oral doses of 2 × 10 CFUs of a local probiotic containing Lactobacillus acidophilus or placebo for 5 days as an adjunct to standard of care. The primary end point was time from the first dose of study medication to the start of the first 24-hour period without diarrhea. Secondary outcomes included the total duration of diarrhea and hospitalization, daily stool frequency, treatment failure, daily fecal concentrations of rotavirus and norovirus, and Lactobacillus colonization.

resultsOne hundred and fifty children were randomized into each study group. The median time from the first dose of study medication to the start of the first 24-hour diarrhea-free period was 43 hours (interquartile range, 15-66 hours) in the placebo group and 35 hours (interquartile range, 20-68 hours) in the probiotic group (acceleration factor 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.51]; P = 0.62). There was also no evidence that probiotic treatment was efficacious in any of the predefined subgroups nor significantly associated with any secondary end point.

conclusionsThis was a large double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which the probiotic underwent longitudinal quality control. We found under these conditions that L. acidophilus was not beneficial in treating children with acute watery diarrhea.

Indexed as

Lactobacillus acidophilusChild, PreschoolDiarrheaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleProbioticsRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsVietnamViral Load

Identifiers

PMID28787388
PMCPMC5681247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.