Trial reportPloS one2017
Efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine patch therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia associated with minimal and moderate ischemic white matter hyperintensities: A multicenter prospective open-label clinical trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01380288 (Changes of Cognitive Function in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Associated With or Without White Matter Changes After Rivastigmine Patch Therapy - Multi-center, Prospective, Open-label Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Changes of Cognitive Function in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Associated With or Without White Matter Changes After Rivastigmine Patch Therapy - Multi-center, Prospective, Open-label Clinical Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Drug Development for Alzheimer's Disease: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Molecular and Structural Insight into Adenosine AMolecular neurobiology · 2023Review
- Caffeine for Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease: Is the ABiomolecules · 2023Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Allicin and Aged Garlic Extract in Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Pathophysiological Role and Medicinal Chemistry of AMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- ACurrent medicinal chemistry · 2022Review
- The Development of Pharmacological Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease.Neurology and therapy · 2021Review
- Neuroprotective Potentials of Panax Ginseng Against Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Evidences.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- An update on the safety of current therapies for Alzheimer's disease: focus on rivastigmine.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveStudies investigating the impact of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on the response of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have presented inconsistent results. We aimed to compare the effects of the rivastigmine patch between patients with AD with minimal WMHs and those with moderate WMHs.
methodsThree hundred patients with mild to moderate AD were enrolled in this multicenter prospective open-label study and divided into two groups. Group 1 comprised patients with AD with minimal WMHs and group 2 comprised those with moderate WMHs. The patients were treated with a rivastigmine patch for 24 weeks. Efficacy measures were obtained at baseline and after 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) from the baseline to the end of the study.
resultsOf the 300 patients, there were 206 patients in group 1 and 94 patients in group 2. The intention-to-treat group comprised 198 patients (group 1, n = 136; group 2, n = 46) during the 24-week study period. Demographic factors did not differ between group 1 and group 2. There were no significant differences in change in ADAS-cog between group 1 (-0.62±5.70) and group 2 (-0.23±5.98) after the 24-week rivastigmine patch therapy (p = 0.378). The patients in group 1 had a 0.63-point improvement from baseline on the Frontal Assessment Battery, while group 2 had a 0.16-point decline compared to baseline at the end of the study (p = 0.037). The rates of adverse events (AEs) (42.6 vs. 40.3%) and discontinuation due to AEs (10.3% vs. 4.3%) did not differ between the groups.
conclusionsAlthough the efficacy and tolerability of rivastigmine patch therapy were not associated with WMH severity in patients with AD, some improvement in frontal function was observed in those with minimal WMHs.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01380288.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.