Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28786946›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Efficient Segmentation of a Breast in B-Mode Ultrasound Tomography Using Three-Dimensional GrabCut (GC3D).

Shaode Yu, Shibin Wu, Ling Zhuang, Xinhua Wei, Mark Sak, Duric Neb, Jiani Hu, Yaoqin Xie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Benchmarking YOLOs in breast ultrasound lesion segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Accurate breast cancer diagnosis using a stable feature ranking algorithm.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaode YuShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China. sd.yu@siat.ac.cn.
Shibin WuShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China. sb.wu@siat.ac.cn.
Ling ZhuangDepartment of Oncology, the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. zhuangling@gmail.com.
Xinhua WeiDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou first Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China. weixinhua@aliyun.com.
Mark SakDepartment of Oncology, the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. sakm@karmanos.org.
Duric NebDepartment of Oncology, the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. duric@karmanos.org.
Jiani HuDepartment of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. jhu@med.wayne.edu.
Yaoqin XieShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China. yq.xie@siat.ac.cn.
Wayne State University · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an emerging modality for whole breast imaging, ultrasound tomography (UST), has been adopted for diagnostic purposes. Efficient segmentation of an entire breast in UST images plays an important role in quantitative tissue analysis and cancer diagnosis, while major existing methods suffer from considerable time consumption and intensive user interaction. This paper explores three-dimensional GrabCut (GC3D) for breast isolation in thirty reflection (B-mode) UST volumetric images. The algorithm can be conveniently initialized by localizing points to form a polygon, which covers the potential breast region. Moreover, two other variations of GrabCut and an active contour method were compared. Algorithm performance was evaluated from volume overlap ratios ( T O , target overlap; M O , mean overlap; F P , false positive; F N , false negative) and time consumption. Experimental results indicate that GC3D considerably reduced the work load and achieved good performance ( T O = 0.84; M O = 0.91; F P = 0.006; F N = 0.16) within an average of 1.2 min per volume. Furthermore, GC3D is not only user friendly, but also robust to various inputs, suggesting its great potential to facilitate clinical applications during whole-breast UST imaging. In the near future, the implemented GC3D can be easily automated to tackle B-mode UST volumetric images acquired from the updated imaging system.

Indexed as

image segmentationultrasound tomographywhole breast imaging

Identifiers

PMID28786946
PMCPMC5580039
OpenAlexW2744511641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.