Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28786399›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2017

Techniques for virtual lung nodule insertion: volumetric and morphometric comparison of projection-based and image-based methods for quantitative CT.

Marthony Robins, Justin Solomon, Pooyan Sahbaee, Martin Sedlmair, Kingshuk Roy Choudhury, Aria Pezeshk, Berkman Sahiner, Ehsan Samei

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep-learning lesion and noise insertion for virtual clinical trial in Chest CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marthony RobinsCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, United States of America.
Justin SolomonCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, United States of America.
Pooyan SahbaeeCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Durham, NC 27705 Department of Physics, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, United States of America.
Martin SedlmairSiemens AG, Forchheim, Germany.
Kingshuk Roy ChoudhuryCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, United States of America.
Aria PezeshkCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States of America.
Berkman SahinerCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, United States of America.
Ehsan SameiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Physics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, United States of America.

Funding

Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500021CNIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual nodule insertion paves the way towards the development of standardized databases of hybrid CT images with known lesions. The purpose of this study was to assess three methods (an established and two newly developed techniques) for inserting virtual lung nodules into CT images. Assessment was done by comparing virtual nodule volume and shape to the CT-derived volume and shape of synthetic nodules. 24 synthetic nodules (three sizes, four morphologies, two repeats) were physically inserted into the lung cavity of an anthropomorphic chest phantom (KYOTO KAGAKU). The phantom was imaged with and without nodules on a commercial CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens) using a standard thoracic CT protocol at two dose levels (1.4 and 22 mGy CTDI

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedHumansLinear ModelsLung NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28786399
PMCPMC5693368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.