Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28786378›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Reverse translation of adverse event reports paves the way for de-risking preclinical off-targets.

Mateusz Maciejewski, Eugen Lounkine, Steven Whitebread, Pierre Farmer, William DuMouchel, Brian K Shoichet, Laszlo Urban

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mateusz MaciejewskiNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1147-4941
Eugen LounkineNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6487-2946
Steven WhitebreadNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States.
Pierre FarmerNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
William DuMouchelOracle Health Sciences, Oracle Health Sciences, Burlington, United States.
Brian K ShoichetUniversity of California, San Francisco, United States.
Laszlo UrbanNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1275-0293
Novartis (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHOracle (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Development and Testing of New Computational Methods for Ligand Discovery and MechanismR35GM122481 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Brian K Shoichet · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
A Web-Based Automatic Virtual Screening SystemR01GM071896 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI IRWIN, JOHN J. · 2004 to 2024
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071896NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) remains the primary source for post-marketing pharmacovigilance. The system is largely un-curated, unstandardized, and lacks a method for linking drugs to the chemical structures of their active ingredients, increasing noise and artefactual trends. To address these problems, we mapped drugs to their ingredients and used natural language processing to classify and correlate drug events. Our analysis exposed key idiosyncrasies in FAERS, for example reports of thalidomide causing a deadly ADR when used against myeloma, a likely result of the disease itself; multiplications of the same report, unjustifiably increasing its importance; correlation of reported ADRs with public events, regulatory announcements, and with publications. Comparing the pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and clinical ADR profiles of methylphenidate, aripiprazole, and risperidone, and of kinase drugs targeting the VEGF receptor, demonstrates how underlying molecular mechanisms can emerge from ADR co-analysis. The precautions and methods we describe may enable investigators to avoid confounding chemistry-based associations and reporting biases in FAERS, and illustrate how comparative analysis of ADRs can reveal underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsPharmacological PhenomenaProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationadverse drug reactionsbig datadata analysisFAERShumanhuman biologymedicine

Identifiers

PMID28786378
PMCPMC5548487
OpenAlexW2742356923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.