ArticleBMC medical genomics2017
Controlling the signal: Practical privacy protection of genomic data sharing through Beacon services.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications and Concerns of ChatGPT and Other Conversational Large Language Models in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Methods for safely sharing dual-use genetic data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- A reinforcement learning-based approach for dynamic privacy protection in genomic data sharing beacons.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Toward owner governance in genomic data privacy with Governome.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Beacon Reconstruction Attack: Reconstruction of genomes in genomic data-sharing beacons using summary statistics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- A decade of research on genetic privacy: the findings of the GetPreCiSe Center at Vanderbilt University.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Enabling tradeoffs in privacy and utility in genomic data Beacons and summary statistics.Genome research · 2023Article
- The evolving privacy and security concerns for genomic data analysis and sharing as observed from the iDASH competition.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Biomedicine.Methods of information in medicine · 2022Article
- Using game theory to thwart multistage privacy intrusions when sharing data.Science advances · 2021Article
- Re-identification of individuals in genomic datasets using public face images.Science advances · 2021Article
- Haplotype-based membership inference from summary genomic data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Privacy-preserving techniques of genomic data-a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Detecting the Presence of an Individual in Phenotypic Summary Data.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018Article
- Real-time Protection of Genomic Data Sharing in Beacon Services.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018Article
- A community effort to protect genomic data sharing, collaboration and outsourcing.NPJ genomic medicine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenomic data is increasingly collected by a wide array of organizations. As such, there is a growing demand to make summary information about such collections available more widely. However, over the past decade, a series of investigations have shown that attacks, rooted in statistical inference methods, can be applied to discern the presence of a known individual's DNA sequence in the pool of subjects. Recently, it was shown that the Beacon Project of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health, a web service for querying about the presence (or absence) of a specific allele, was vulnerable. The Integrating Data for Analysis, Anonymization, and Sharing (iDASH) Center modeled a track in their third Privacy Protection Challenge on how to mitigate the Beacon vulnerability. We developed the winning solution for this track.
methodsThis paper describes our computational method to optimize the tradeoff between the utility and the privacy of the Beacon service. We generalize the genomic data sharing problem beyond that which was introduced in the iDASH Challenge to be more representative of real world scenarios to allow for a more comprehensive evaluation. We then conduct a sensitivity analysis of our method with respect to several state-of-the-art methods using a dataset of 400,000 positions in Chromosome 10 for 500 individuals from Phase 3 of the 1000 Genomes Project. All methods are evaluated for utility, privacy and efficiency.
resultsOur method achieves better performance than all state-of-the-art methods, irrespective of how key factors (e.g., the allele frequency in the population, the size of the pool and utility weights) change from the original parameters of the problem. We further illustrate that it is possible for our method to exhibit subpar performance under special cases of allele query sequences. However, we show our method can be extended to address this issue when the query sequence is fixed and known a priori to the data custodian, so that they may plan stage their responses accordingly.
conclusionsThis research shows that it is possible to thwart the attack on Beacon services, without substantially altering the utility of the system, using computational methods. The method we initially developed is limited by the design of the scenario and evaluation protocol for the iDASH Challenge; however, it can be improved by allowing the data custodian to act in a staged manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.