GuidelineJournal of applied clinical medical physics2017
AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.a. for SRS-SBRT.
Guideline in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.b: SRS-SBRT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Guideline
- AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.b: Linear accelerator performance tests.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Guideline
- End to end dosimetric and geometric verification of single isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery using an anthropomorphic phantom: external audit validation.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Dose accuracy evaluation of multi-leaf collimator modeling in single-isocenter multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Increasing demands on commissioning and quality assurance for cone-based multiple brain metastases robotic radiosurgery: evaluation in a custom phantom.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical assessment of dedicated SRS detector for dose verification in SBRT/SRS treatment plans: to establish clinical threshold with AAPM TG-218 recommendation.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Accelerated and standardized commissioning of a robotic RadioSurgery system using a hybrid golden beam data model.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Phantom benchmarking for quality assurance of synthetic computed tomography in cranial magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Development of a cost-effective end-to-end commissioning test for simulation-omitted direct-to-unit adaptive radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Dosimetric intercomparison for stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and clinical use of novel high-resolution EPID-based 2D and 3D automated patient-specific quality assurance for SRS and SBRT patients.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Monte Carlo-based independent dose calculation system for brain stereotactic radiotherapy using a robotic radiosurgery system.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Clinical Workflow of Spine Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery: Insights from a Single-Institution Physics Perspective.Cancers · 2026Article
- Rapid commissioning of Brainlab Elements for SRS: end-to-end evaluation of Monte Carlo and pencil beam algorithm across homogeneous and heterogeneous phantom environments.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multicenter evaluation of planning quality in intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- High-accuracy quality control method of CT system couch tops for treatment planning via an advanced 3D coordinate measuring machine.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- A pathway away from measurement-based patient-specific QA: A review of contemporary quality assurance for external-beam radiotherapy sub-systems.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Review
- Evaluating Monaco 6.2.2 in complex radiotherapy across matched LINACs: improved MLC modelling and dose accuracy with virtual source model 2.0.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical implementation of a multifaceted quality assurance phantom for high-precision radiation therapy: an institutional experience.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Improving dose delivery in non-coplanar cranial SRS: Stereoscopic x-ray-guided mitigation of table walkout errors.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8,000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines: Must and Must Not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. Should and Should Not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances. Approved by AAPM Professional Council 3-31-2017 and Executive Committee 4-4-2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.