Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28786203›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2017

The fate of the vitelline and umbilical veins during the development of the human liver.

Jill P J M Hikspoors, Mathijs M J P Peeters, Hayelom K Mekonen, Nutmethee Kruepunga, Greet M C Mommen, Pieter Cornillie, S Eleonore Köhler, Wouter H Lamers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Congenital Portosystemic Shunts: A Review.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Generation ofRegenerative therapy · 2024
    Review
  7. Human Cardiac Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Fetal liver development and implications for liver disease pathogenesis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jill P J M HikspoorsDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mathijs M J P PeetersDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hayelom K MekonenDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nutmethee KruepungaDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Greet M C MommenDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pieter CornillieDepartment of Morphology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
S Eleonore KöhlerDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wouter H LamersDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3032-7824
Maastricht University · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiation of endodermal cells into hepatoblasts is well studied, but the remodeling of the vitelline and umbilical veins during liver development is less well understood. We compared human embryos between 3 and 10 weeks of development with pig and mouse embryos at comparable stages, and used Amira 3D reconstruction and Cinema 4D remodeling software for visualization. The vitelline and umbilical veins enter the systemic venous sinus on each side via a common entrance, the hepatocardiac channel. During expansion into the transverse septum at Carnegie Stage (CS)12 the liver bud develops as two dorsolateral lobes or 'wings' and a single ventromedial lobe, with the liver hilum at the intersection of these lobes. The dorsolateral lobes each engulf a vitelline vein during CS13 and the ventromedial lobe both umbilical veins during CS14, but both venous systems remain temporarily identifiable inside the liver. The dominance of the left-sided umbilical vein and the rightward repositioning of the sinuatrial junction cause de novo development of left-to-right shunts between the left umbilical vein in the liver hilum and the right hepatocardiac channel (venous duct) and the right vitelline vein (portal sinus), respectively. Once these shunts have formed, portal branches develop from the intrahepatic portions of the portal vein on the right side and the umbilical vein on the left side. The gall bladder is a reliable marker for this hepatic vascular midline. We found no evidence for large-scale fragmentation of embryonic veins as claimed by the 'vestigial' theory. Instead and in agreement with the 'lineage' theory, the vitelline and umbilical veins remained temporally identifiable inside the liver after being engulfed by hepatoblasts. In agreement with the 'hemodynamic' theory, the left-right shunts develop de novo.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLiverMiceSwineUmbilical VeinsVitelline Ductliver budliver primordiumportal veinsinusoidsumbilical veinvenous ductvenous sinusvitelline vein

Identifiers

PMID28786203
PMCPMC5643923
OpenAlexW2742242296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.