Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785943›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Toxicity evaluation of vinasse and biosolid samples in diplopod midgut: heat shock protein in situ localization.

Maria Paula Mancini Coelho, Cristina Moreira-de-Sousa, Raphael Bastão de Souza, Yadira Ansoar-Rodríguez, Elaine Cristina Mathias Silva-Zacarin, Carmem Silvia Fontanetti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Paula Mancini CoelhoDepartment of Biology, Biosciences Institute, UNESP (São Paulo State University), Av. 24-A, 1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo, 13506-900, Brazil.
Cristina Moreira-de-SousaDepartment of Biology, Biosciences Institute, UNESP (São Paulo State University), Av. 24-A, 1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo, 13506-900, Brazil.
Raphael Bastão de SouzaDepartment of Biology, Biosciences Institute, UNESP (São Paulo State University), Av. 24-A, 1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo, 13506-900, Brazil.
Yadira Ansoar-RodríguezDepartment of Biology, Biosciences Institute, UNESP (São Paulo State University), Av. 24-A, 1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo, 13506-900, Brazil.
Elaine Cristina Mathias Silva-ZacarinDepartment of Biology, CCHB, UFSCar (Universidade Federal de São Carlos), Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carmem Silvia FontanettiDepartment of Biology, Biosciences Institute, UNESP (São Paulo State University), Av. 24-A, 1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo, 13506-900, Brazil. fontanet@rc.unesp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2012/50197-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/12646-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large amounts of residues generated by agricultural, urban and industrial activities are dumped daily on the soil. This practice deserves special attention because it causes serious environmental problems. This study evaluated the toxic potential of the sugarcane vinasse, a by-product of the sugar-alcohol industry, and the biosolid, a residue produced by wastewater treatment plants, both widely used as fertilizers. The evaluation was performed through bioassays using a typical soil bioindicator, the diplopod Rhinocricus padbergi. The specimens were exposed to soils containing these residues in concentrations that are compatible with the Brazilian regulation for agricultural use. Semi-quantitative immunolabelling analyses of the stress protein HSP70 were performed on the midgut of the studied diplopods. There was a significant increase in the immunolabelling of HSP70 proteins as a response to xenobiotics from both residues, particularly in regions where the function of the cells is the detoxification of the organ (e.g. the hepatic cell layer and specific regions of the epithelium). Higher immunolabelling was observed in the specimens exposed to vinasse in comparison with the biosolid exposure. This demonstrates that the substances in the tested residues had proteotoxic action in the exposed animals and induced a cytoprotective response, which led to higher stress protein immunolabelling. Therefore, caution is needed for the use of such residues in agriculture.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod ProteinsArthropodsGastrointestinal TractHeat-Shock ProteinsOrgan SpecificitySaccharumSoil PollutantsSolid WasteArthropod ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsSoil PollutantsSolid WasteFertilizersHSP70ImmunohistochemistryMillipedesR. padbergiSoil toxicity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.