Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785927›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2017

Therapy of Sinonasal Microbiome in CRS: A Critical Approach.

Alkis J Psaltis, Peter-John Wormald

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05400616 (Phase-II Randomized Control Trial of Nasal Microbiota Transplant Therapy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05400616 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Phase-II Randomized Control Trial of Nasal Microbiota Transplant Therapy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps (CRSsNP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of QueenslandRan2022 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsChronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)ArmsMicrobiome Transplant, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Novel Model ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Nasal Microbiota and Sensitivity Pattern in Rhinosinusitis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Autoimmunity: A New Focus on Nasal Polyps.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. A Review on the Nasal Microbiome and Various Disease Conditions for Newer Approaches to Treatments.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Comparing the nasal bacterial microbiome diversity of allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis and control subjects.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Microbiomics of irrigation with xylitol orLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alkis J PsaltisDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia. alkis.psaltis@adelaide.edu.au.
Peter-John WormaldDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPerturbations in local microbiota have been demonstrated in many chronic inflammatory diseases including chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The purpose of this paper is to review the latest microbiome research as it pertains to CRS and establish whether there is any evidence supporting the microbiome hypothesis for CRS. Treatment factors that may influence the sinonasal microbiome as well as the role of probiotics are also discussed. RECENT

findingsDespite significant heterogeneity in study design, tissue sampling, processing and bioinformatics analysis, consistent findings have emerged from the recent literature. Healthy individuals and CRS patients have similar overall bacterial burden of disease and share many common phylum. CRS patients, however, routinely show reductions in markers of biodiversity. Both medical and surgical treatments appear to influence the sinonasal microbiome, with certain bacterial strains associated with better treatment outcomes. The presence of microbial dysbiosis in CRS is now supported by numerous studies. Whether this dysbiosis is a cause or rather an association of the disease process still remains unclear. Although probiotic therapies show early promise, much larger studies are required to establish their real role as a treatment for CRS.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsChronic DiseaseDysbiosisHumansProbioticsRhinitisSinusitisTreatment OutcomeChronic rhinosinusitisMicrobial dysbiosisMicrobiotaSinonasal microbiome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.