Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785912›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2018

Consensus statement on definition, diagnosis, and management of high-risk prostate cancer patients on behalf of the Spanish Groups of Uro-Oncology Societies URONCOR, GUO, and SOGUG.

I Henríquez, A Rodríguez-Antolín, J Cassinello, C Gonzalez San Segundo, M Unda, E Gallardo, J López-Torrecilla, A Juarez, J Arranz

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

I HenríquezRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario of Sant Joan, Institute d'Investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), Josep Laporte 2, 43204, Reus, Spain. ivanhenriquezlopez@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2771-4049
A Rodríguez-AntolínUrology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
J CassinelloMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.
C Gonzalez San SegundoRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
M UndaUrology Department, Hospital Barakaldo, Bilbao, Spain.
E GallardoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.
J López-TorrecillaRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Eresa, Valencia, Spain.
A JuarezUrology Department, Hospital Cádiz, Andalucía, Spain.
J ArranzMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESDeleted InstitutionEndesa (Spain) · ESHospital de Cruces · ESHospital Universitario de Guadalajara · ESInstitut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent malignancy in men and the second cause of mortality in industrialized countries.

methodsBased on Spanish Register of PCa, the incidence of high-risk PCa is 29%, approximately. In spite of the evidence-based beneficial effect of radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk PCa, these patients (pts) are still a therapeutic challenge for all specialists involved, in part due to the absence of comparative studies to establish which of the present disposable treatments offer better results.

resultsNowadays, high-risk PCa definition is not well consensual through the published oncology guides. Clinical stage, tumour grade, and number of risk factors are relevant to be considered on PCa prognosis. However, these factors are susceptible to change depending on when surgical or radiation therapy is considered to be the treatment of choice. Other factors, such as reference pathologist, different diagnosis biopsy schedules, surgical or radiotherapy techniques, adjuvant treatments, biochemical failures, and follow-up, make it difficult to compare the results between different therapeutic options.

conclusionsThis article reviews important issues concerning high-risk PCa. URONCOR, GUO, and SOGUG on behalf of the Spanish Groups of Uro-Oncology Societies have reached a consensus addressing a practical recommendation on definition, diagnosis, and management of high-risk PCa.

Indexed as

HumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsSpainChemotherapyHigh-risk prostate cancerProstate cancerRadiotherapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID28785912
OpenAlexW2743125276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.