ReviewIntensive care medicine2017
The intensive care medicine research agenda for airways, invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactate to albumin ratio predicts one year mortality in ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Using machine learning techniques for early prediction of tracheal intubation in patients with septic shock: a multi-center study in South Korea.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Impact of initial ventilation strategies on in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients: insights from the MIMIC-IV database.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Assessment of ROX and HACOR Scores to Predict Non-Invasive Ventilation Failure in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024Article
- Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: Does Use of a Video Laryngoscope Facilitate Both Steps of the Procedure?Annals of emergency medicine · 2023Observational
- An updated HACOR score for predicting the failure of noninvasive ventilation: a multicenter prospective observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Observational
- Quantifying the reduction of respiratory motion by mechanical ventilation with MRI for radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Acute Respiratory Failure-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Brain-lung interactions and mechanical ventilation in patients with isolated brain injury.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Review
- The potential of real-time analytics to improve care for mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: an early economic evaluation.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2020Article
- Article
- Videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Article
- Obesity in the critically ill: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2019Review
- Nasal high-flow preoxygenation for endotracheal intubation in the critically ill patient? Maybe.Intensive care medicine · 2019Article
- ARDS in Obese Patients: Specificities and Management.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Review
- Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study.Critical care medicine · 2019Observational
- Focus on ventilation management.Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
- Risk factors and outcomes for airway failure versus non-airway failure in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational study of 1514 extubation procedures.Critical care (London, England) · 2018Observational
- Noninvasive ventilation for respiratory failure: a note of caution in selected patients.Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an important sense, support of the respiratory system has been a defining characteristic of intensive care since its inception. The pace of basic and clinical research in this field has escalated over the past two decades, resulting in palpable improvement at the bedside as measured by both efficacy and outcome. As in all medical research, however, novel ideas built upon observations are continually proposed, tested, and either retained or discarded on the basis of the persuasiveness of the evidence. What follows are concise descriptions of the current standards of management practice in respiratory support, the areas of present-day uncertainty, and our suggested agenda for the near future of research aimed at testing current assumptions, probing uncertainties, and solidifying the foundation on which to base our progress to the next level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28785882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.