Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785850›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2018

Highly accelerated intracranial 4D flow MRI: evaluation of healthy volunteers and patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Jing Liu, Louise Koskas, Farshid Faraji, Evan Kao, Yan Wang, Henrik Haraldsson, Sarah Kefayati, Chengcheng Zhu, Sinyeob Ahn, Gerhard Laub and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quality Control for 4D Flow MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jing LiuRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA. jing.liu@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3571-2230
Louise KoskasRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Farshid FarajiRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Evan KaoRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Yan WangRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Henrik HaraldssonRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Sarah KefayatiRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Chengcheng ZhuRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
Sinyeob AhnSiemens Healthcare, California, USA.
Gerhard LaubSiemens Healthcare, California, USA.
David SalonerRadiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USSiemens Healthcare (United States) · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · US

Funding

MRI of Structure and Function in Assessing Hemodynamic Impact on AAA EvolutionR01HL114118 · NHLBI · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI SALONER, DAVID A · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
4D MRI Development for Cardiovascular ImagingK25EB014914 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIU, JING · 2012 to 2016
$842k
Comprehensive quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of aortic valve diseaseR56HL133663 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIU, JING · 2016 to 2016
$367k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114118NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL114118NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL133663NHLBI NIH HHS R56HL133663NIBIB NIH HHS K25 EB014914NIBIB NIH HHS K25EB014914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate an accelerated 4D flow MRI method that provides high temporal resolution in a clinically feasible acquisition time for intracranial velocity imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsAccelerated 4D flow MRI was developed by using a pseudo-random variable-density Cartesian undersampling strategy (CIRCUS) with the combination of k-t, parallel imaging and compressed sensing image reconstruction techniques (k-t SPARSE-SENSE). Four-dimensional flow data were acquired on five healthy volunteers and eight patients with intracranial aneurysms using CIRCUS (acceleration factor of R = 4, termed CIRCUS4) and GRAPPA (R = 2, termed GRAPPA2) as the reference method. Images with three times higher temporal resolution (R = 12, CIRCUS12) were also reconstructed from the same acquisition as CIRCUS4. Qualitative and quantitative image assessment was performed on the images acquired with different methods, and complex flow patterns in the aneurysms were identified and compared.

resultsFour-dimensional flow MRI with CIRCUS was achieved in 5 min and allowed further improved temporal resolution of <30 ms. Volunteer studies showed similar qualitative and quantitative evaluation obtained with the proposed approach compared to the reference (overall image scores: GRAPPA2 3.2 ± 0.6; CIRCUS4 3.1 ± 0.7; CIRCUS12 3.3 ± 0.4; difference of the peak velocities: -3.83 ± 7.72 cm/s between CIRCUS4 and GRAPPA2, -1.72 ± 8.41 cm/s between CIRCUS12 and GRAPPA2). In patients with intracranial aneurysms, the higher temporal resolution improved capturing of the flow features in intracranial aneurysms (pathline visualization scores: GRAPPA2 2.2 ± 0.2; CIRCUS4 2.5 ± 0.5; CIRCUS12 2.7 ± 0.6).

conclusionThe proposed rapid 4D flow MRI with a high temporal resolution is a promising tool for evaluating intracranial aneurysms in a clinically feasible acquisition time.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleReproducibility of Results4D flowAccelerationAneurysmCompressed sensingIntracranialUndersampling

Identifiers

PMID28785850
PMCPMC5803461
OpenAlexW2745046022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.