Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785782›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2017

Throwing the baby out with the bath water - response to the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) report on traumatic shaking.

Dawn Saunders, Maria Raissaki, Sabah Servaes, Catherine Adamsbaum, Arabinda Kumar Choudhary, Joëlle Anne Moreno, Rick R van Rijn, Amaka C Offiah, Written on behalf of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Child Abuse Task Force and the Society for Pediatric Radiology Child Abuse Committee

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Preparing for court testimony.Pediatric radiology · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pediatric abusive head trauma.Biomedical journal · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shaken baby syndrome is real.Pediatric radiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dawn SaundersGreat Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust for Children, Institute of Child Health, WC1N 3JH, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8255-2225
Maria RaissakiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Iraklio, Greece.
Sabah ServaesThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Catherine AdamsbaumAP-HP, Bicêtre Hospital, Pediatric Imaging Department, Paris Sud University, Bicêtre, France.
Arabinda Kumar ChoudharyDepartment of Medical Imaging, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Joëlle Anne MorenoFlorida International University, College of Law, Miami, FL, USA.
Rick R van RijnDepartment of Radiology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amaka C OffiahAcademic Unit of Child Health, Sheffield Childrens NHS Foundation Trust, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. a.offiah@sheffield.ac.uk.
Written on behalf of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Child Abuse Task Force and the Society for Pediatric Radiology Child Abuse Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Shaken Baby SyndromeTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalHumansSocial WorkSweden

Identifiers

PMID28785782
PMCPMC5608779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.