Trial reportAnnals of internal medicine2017
Expansion of Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection by Task Shifting to Community-Based Nonspecialist Providers: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Annals of internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IV Pilot Study to Assess Community-Based Treatment Efficacy in Chronic Hepatitis C Monoinfection and Coinfection With HIV in the District of Columbia
The RESPOND Outcomes Study - A Study in the RESPOND Consortium (RESPOND: International Cohort Consortium of Infectious Diseases)
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 225 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hepatitis C Guidance 2019 Update: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2020Guideline
- Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of community and primary-care-based hepatitis C testing and treatment services that employ direct acting antiviral drug treatments.BMC health services research · 2019Pooled it
- Hepatitis B and C prevalence and incidence in key population groups with multiple risk factors in the EU/EEA: a systematic review.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019Pooled it
- Pharmacist-Led Hepatitis C Diagnosis and Rapid Management-In Community (PHARM-C): Results From a Phase IV Nonblinded Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2026Trial
- Nurse case management to improve the hepatitis C care continuum in HIV co-infection: Results of a randomized controlled trial.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2020Trial
- Caregiver oral rehydration solution fluid monitoring charts versus standard care for the management of some dehydration among Kenyan children: a randomized controlled trial.International health · 2018Trial
- Trends in chronic hepatitis C visits by providers in Quebec, Canada: A population-level cohort study.Canadian liver journal · 2026Article
- Hepatitis C Treatment by Early-Career US Family Physicians.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Albumin prevents kidney injury but is underutilized in a cohort of patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis.Hepatology communications · 2025Article
- Trends in Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B Deaths Identify Successes and Disparities, Alameda County, CA, 2005 - 2022.Gastroenterology research · 2025Article
- Hepatitis C-Everything a Primary Care Physician Needs to Know About Diagnosis, Management, and Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Hepatitis C Nucleic Acid Test Positive (NAT+) Solid Organ Consent Rates Are Highest in Patients Listed for Liver Transplant and With an English Language Preference.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
- Prescribing direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment: a scoping review of factors that influence primary care providers.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Sustained Impact of Task-shifting HCV Treatment to Nonspecialist Providers: 5-Year Follow Up of the ASCEND Investigation.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Simplified Treatment of Hepatitis C during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis of the British Columbia Hepatitis C Network.Canadian liver journal · 2025Article
- Patient-Identified Barriers to Hepatitis C Treatment.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap: Addressing disparities in hepatitis C screening, access to care, and treatment outcomes.World journal of hepatology · 2024Review
- Pilot study of a community pharmacist led program to treat hepatitis C virus among people who inject drugs.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2024Article
- Does a simplified algorithm and integrated HCV care model improve linkage to care, retention, and cure among people who inject drugs? A pragmatic quality improvement randomized controlled trial protocol.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has resulted in high rates of disease cure; however, not enough specialists currently are available to provide care. Objective: To determine the efficacy of HCV treatment independently provided by nurse practitioners (NPs), primary care physicians (PCPs), or specialist physicians using DAA therapy. Design: Nonrandomized, open-label clinical trial initiated in 2015. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02339038). Setting: 13 urban, federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in the District of Columbia. Patients: A referred sample of 600 patients, of whom 96% were black, 69% were male, 82% were treatment naive, and 20% had cirrhosis. Seventy-two percent of the patients had HCV genotype 1a infection. The baseline characteristics of patients seen by each provider type were similar. Intervention: Patients were assigned in a nonrandomized but specified manner to receive treatment from 1 of 5 NPs, 5 PCPs, or 6 specialists. All providers underwent an identical 3-hour training session based on guidelines. Patients received treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir, which was provided on site, according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling requirements. Measurements: Sustained virologic response (SVR). Results: 516 patients achieved SVR, a response rate of 86% (95% CI, 83.0% to 88.7%), with no major safety signals. Response rates were consistent across the 3 provider types: NPs, 89.3% (CI, 83.3% to 93.8%); PCPs, 86.9% (CI, 80.6% to 91.7%); and specialists, 83.8% (CI, 79.0% to 87.8%). Patient loss to follow-up was the major cause of non-SVR. Limitation: Nonrandomized patient distribution; possible referral bias. Conclusion: In a real-world cohort of patients at urban FQHCs, HCV treatment administered by nonspecialist providers was as safe and effective as that provided by specialists. Nurse practitioners and PCPs with compact didactic training could substantially expand the availability of community-based providers to escalate HCV therapy, bridging existing gaps in the continuum of care for patients with HCV infection. Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health and Gilead Sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.