Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28785634›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2015

Substantial radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease interventions with a novel X-ray imaging technology.

Nikolaus A Haas, Christoph M Happel, Maria Mauti, Cherif Sahyoun, Lea Z Tebart, Deniz Kececioglu, Kai Thorsten Laser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Implementing Patient Protection Radiation Dose Alerts for Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Examinations.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Choice of tube extremity for emission of the lowest radiation dose in pediatric patients.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nikolaus A HaasDepartment for Congenital Heart Defects, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
Christoph M HappelDepartment for Congenital Heart Defects, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
Maria MautiPhilips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands.
Cherif SahyounPhilips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands.
Lea Z TebartDepartment for Congenital Heart Defects, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
Deniz KececiogluDepartment for Congenital Heart Defects, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
Kai Thorsten LaserDepartment for Congenital Heart Defects, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric catheterization exposes patients to varying radiation doses. Concerns over the effects of X-ray radiation dose on the patient population have increased in recent years. This study aims at quantifying the patient radiation dose reduction after the introduction of an X-ray imaging technology using advanced real time image noise reduction algorithms and optimized acquisition chain for fluoroscopy and exposure in a pediatric and adult population with congenital heart disease.

methodsPatient and radiation dose data was retrospectively collected (July 2012-February 2013) for 338 consecutive patients treated with a system using state of the art image processing and reference acquisition chain (referred as "reference system"). The same data was collected (March-October 2013) for 329 consecutive patients treated with the new imaging technology (Philips AlluraClarity, referred as "new system"). Patients were divided into three weight groups: A) below 10 kg, B) 10-40 kg, and C) over 40 kg. Radiation dose was quantified using dose area product (DAP), while procedure complexity using fluoroscopy time, procedure duration and volume of contrast medium.

resultsThe new system provides significant patient dose reduction compared to the reference system. Median DAP values were reduced in group A) from 140.6 cGy·cm

conclusionsDespite no other changes in procedural approach, the novel X-ray imaging technology provided substantial radiation dose reduction of 56% or higher.

Indexed as

Congenital heart diseaseDAPDose reductionInterventional therapyRadiation exposureX-ray imaging technology

Identifiers

PMID28785634
PMCPMC5497176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.